The Collaborative Seismic Earth Model: Generation 2

Abstract Geological interpretations, earthquake source inversions and ground motion modeling, among other applications, require models that jointly resolve crustal and mantle structure. With the second generation of the Collaborative Seismic Earth Model (CSEM2), we present a global multi‐resolution tomographic Earth model that serves this purpose. The model evolves through successive regional‐ and global‐scale refinements. While the first generation aggregated regional models, with this study, we ensure consistency between all individual submodels, resulting in a model that accurately explains wave propagation across scales. Recent regional tomographic models were incorporated, comprising continental‐scale inversions for Asia and Africa, as well as regional inversions for the Western US, Central Andes, Iran, and Southeast Asia. Across all regional refinements, over 793,000 source‐receiver pairs contributed. Moreover, the long‐wavelength Earth model (LOWE) introduces large‐scale structures outside of pre‐existing local refinements. A full‐waveform inversion for global anisotropic P‐and S‐wave speed structure over a total of 194 iterations with a minimum period of 50 s on a large data set of 1 hr of waveform data from 2,423 earthquakes and over 6 million source‐receiver pairs ensures that regional updates in the crust and uppermost mantle translate into updates of deeper, global‐scale structure. To test the performance of CSEM2, we evaluate waveform fits between observed and synthetic seismograms at 50 s for an independent data set on the global scale, and on the regional scale for lower periods. We accurately simulate waveforms within and across regional refinements, maintaining the original resolution of the submodels embedded in the global framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb029656
Citations
2
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Collaborative Seismic Earth Model: Generation 2

Arthur Rodgers, Dirk‐Philip van Herwaarden, Andreas Fichtner, Neda Masouminia et al.
2 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
High-pressure geophysics and materials
1.07
article

The Collaborative Seismic Earth Model: Generation 2

Arthur Rodgers, Dirk‐Philip van Herwaarden, Andreas Fichtner, Neda Masouminia, Marta Pienkowska, Yajian Gao, Frederik Tilmann, Deborah Wehner, Jincheng Ma, Hans‐Peter Bunge, Nicholas J.F. Rawlinson, Sebastian Noe, Sölvi Thrastarson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Geological interpretations, earthquake source inversions and ground motion modeling, among other applications, require models that jointly resolve crustal and mantle structure. With the second generation of the Collaborative Seismic Earth Model (CSEM2), we present a global multi‐resolution tomographic Earth model that serves this purpose. The model evolves through successive regional‐ and global‐scale refinements. While the first generation aggregated regional models, with this study, we ensure consistency between all individual submodels, resulting in a model that accurately explains wave propagation across scales. Recent regional tomographic models were incorporated, comprising continental‐scale inversions for Asia and Africa, as well as regional inversions for the Western US, Central Andes, Iran, and Southeast Asia. Across all regional refinements, over 793,000 source‐receiver pairs contributed. Moreover, the long‐wavelength Earth model (LOWE) introduces large‐scale structures outside of pre‐existing local refinements. A full‐waveform inversion for global anisotropic P‐and S‐wave speed structure over a total of 194 iterations with a minimum period of 50 s on a large data set of 1 hr of waveform data from 2,423 earthquakes and over 6 million source‐receiver pairs ensures that regional updates in the crust and uppermost mantle translate into updates of deeper, global‐scale structure. To test the performance of CSEM2, we evaluate waveform fits between observed and synthetic seismograms at 50 s for an independent data set on the global scale, and on the regional scale for lower periods. We accurately simulate waveforms within and across regional refinements, maintaining the original resolution of the submodels embedded in the global framework.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 129(12)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), Peking University (CN), University of Tehran (IR), University of Cambridge (GB), ETH Zurich (CH), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
U.S. Department of Energy, European Commission, Centro Svizzero di Calcolo Scientifico, National Supercomputing Centre Singapore, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
1.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.