On the use of representative specimens for the structural integrity assessment of safety-relevant rotating components

• Design of specimens representative of the damage critical locations in the component. • Introduction of an assessment level based on quasi-static testing of representative specimens. • Development of a two-criteria failure assessment procedure based on fracture mechanics. • Implementation of a hybrid procedure for the determination of J-R-curves. • Successful prediction of the failure modes and critical loads of the representative specimens Safety-relevant components, for which a failure in service could have catastrophic consequences, are usually designed for extremely low probability of failure and they are subjected to stringent part qualification procedures according to guidelines set by regulatory agencies. Manufacturers are often forced to perform tests on full scale or scaled components to ensure the structural integrity under defined loading conditions, which usually implies a huge experimental and financial effort. Therefore, companies try to develop new strategies such as digital twins, which allow to massively reduce costs, without compromising safety. This work presents a new quasi-static testing and assessment concept, the main idea of which is to replace, or at least reduce, the experimental testing on components by testing specimens representative of the component. Fracture mechanics specimens have been designed iteratively by numerical simulations to match the stress state at the crack-tip of the maximum permissible defect defined by regulatory agencies for the component. Potentially, the major benefit of the proposed approach is that the tests can be performed on conventional laboratory testing machines. The effectiveness of the methodology is demonstrated in case of the structural integrity assessment of a Ni-base superalloy aero-engine turbine disk at overspeed conditions.