Machine learning-based prognostic prediction and surgical guidance for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The prognosis following radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is poor, and optimal follow-up strategies remain unclear, with ongoing debates regarding anatomic resection (AR) versus non-anatomic resection (NAR). This study included 680 patients from five hospitals, comparing a combination of eight feature screening methods and 11 machine learning algorithms to predict prognosis and construct integrated models. These models were assessed using nested cross-validation and various datasets, benchmarked against TNM stage and performance status. Evaluation metrics such as area under the curve (AUC) were applied. Prognostic models incorporating screened features showed superior performance compared to unselected models, with AR emerging as a key variable. Treatment recommendation models for surgical approaches, including DeepSurv, neural network multitask logistic regression (N-MTLR), and Kernel support vector machine (SVM), indicated that N-MTLR's recommendations were associated with survival benefits. Additionally, some patients identified as suitable for NAR were within groups previously considered for AR. In conclusion, three robust clinical models were developed to predict ICC prognosis and optimize surgical decisions, improving patient outcomes and supporting shared decision-making for patients and surgeons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioScience Trends
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01312
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning-based prognostic prediction and surgical guidance for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Chun Zhang, Long Huang, Juanyong Pan, Shi Chen et al.
3 citations
BioScience Trends
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
1.72
article

Machine learning-based prognostic prediction and surgical guidance for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Chun Zhang, Long Huang, Juanyong Pan, Shi Chen, Liang Wang, Shun‐Cang Zhu, Ge Li, Yifeng Tian, Jianlin Lai, Jianbo Li
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The prognosis following radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is poor, and optimal follow-up strategies remain unclear, with ongoing debates regarding anatomic resection (AR) versus non-anatomic resection (NAR). This study included 680 patients from five hospitals, comparing a combination of eight feature screening methods and 11 machine learning algorithms to predict prognosis and construct integrated models. These models were assessed using nested cross-validation and various datasets, benchmarked against TNM stage and performance status. Evaluation metrics such as area under the curve (AUC) were applied. Prognostic models incorporating screened features showed superior performance compared to unselected models, with AR emerging as a key variable. Treatment recommendation models for surgical approaches, including DeepSurv, neural network multitask logistic regression (N-MTLR), and Kernel support vector machine (SVM), indicated that N-MTLR's recommendations were associated with survival benefits. Additionally, some patients identified as suitable for NAR were within groups previously considered for AR. In conclusion, three robust clinical models were developed to predict ICC prognosis and optimize surgical decisions, improving patient outcomes and supporting shared decision-making for patients and surgeons.

BioScience TrendsVol. 18(6)
Fujian Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (CN), Fujian Provincial Hospital (CN), Union Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.