Populism, the far right and EU integration: beyond simple dichotomies

Parties on the ideological fringes, or those that wish to portray themselves as political outsiders, are generally assumed to be Eurosceptic: opposed to the EU or the current direction of European integration.While it is evident that radical populist parties, in their various forms, are inclined to criticise the EU, it is also clear that they are not usually 'anti-European' or opposed to all forms of European cooperation.Studying the topic through different conceptual lenses, the three books discussed in this article question received wisdoms about actors that are usually assumed to oppose 'Europe', and confirm that we need to move beyond simplistic pro-and anti-categories.One lesson derived from the three studies combined is that there is scope for more precision in terms of how conceptual categories (such as 'populism', 'far right', 'illiberalism') can be used to understand and describe Eurosceptic discourses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Integration
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2434341
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Populism, the far right and EU integration: beyond simple dichotomies

Stijn van Kessel
6 citations
Journal of European Integration
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
13.39
article

Populism, the far right and EU integration: beyond simple dichotomies

Stijn van Kessel
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Parties on the ideological fringes, or those that wish to portray themselves as political outsiders, are generally assumed to be Eurosceptic: opposed to the EU or the current direction of European integration.While it is evident that radical populist parties, in their various forms, are inclined to criticise the EU, it is also clear that they are not usually 'anti-European' or opposed to all forms of European cooperation.Studying the topic through different conceptual lenses, the three books discussed in this article question received wisdoms about actors that are usually assumed to oppose 'Europe', and confirm that we need to move beyond simplistic pro-and anti-categories.One lesson derived from the three studies combined is that there is scope for more precision in terms of how conceptual categories (such as 'populism', 'far right', 'illiberalism') can be used to understand and describe Eurosceptic discourses.

Journal of European IntegrationVol. 47(1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.