Prediction of Particle Dynamics in Bubbling Fluidized Beds with Inertial Number-Based Drag and Solid Stress Models

Gas–solid fluidized bed reactors are widely used in industry. Since two-phase flows in fluidized beds often coexist with multiple flow states, the interaction mechanism between the phases is complex, and accurate simulation has always been a challenge. In this paper, the inertia number is used as a measure of the transition of the drag model and the solid stress model from the inertial region (low particle concentration) to the quasi-static region (high particle concentration) to achieve the dynamic transition of different interphase interaction mechanisms. Through the simulation of the fluidization process of Geldart D particles, it is found that the drag and solid stress models based on the inertia number can more accurately describe the particle flow behavior in the 3D fluidized bed than the two-fluid model combined with traditional kinetic theory of granular flow and achieve a prediction accuracy close to CFD-DEM by presenting a nearly realistic bubble formation process. This provides a more computationally resource-efficient and effective tool for accurately modeling gas–solid two-phase flows at the reactor scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03300
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Particle Dynamics in Bubbling Fluidized Beds with Inertial Number-Based Drag and Solid Stress Models

Junnan Zhao, Xiaolong Yin, Xinyao Guo, Guodong Liu et al.
2 citations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Granular flow and fluidized beds
0.75
article

Prediction of Particle Dynamics in Bubbling Fluidized Beds with Inertial Number-Based Drag and Solid Stress Models

Junnan Zhao, Xiaolong Yin, Xinyao Guo, Guodong Liu, Chunlei Wang, Xinyi Zuo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Gas–solid fluidized bed reactors are widely used in industry. Since two-phase flows in fluidized beds often coexist with multiple flow states, the interaction mechanism between the phases is complex, and accurate simulation has always been a challenge. In this paper, the inertia number is used as a measure of the transition of the drag model and the solid stress model from the inertial region (low particle concentration) to the quasi-static region (high particle concentration) to achieve the dynamic transition of different interphase interaction mechanisms. Through the simulation of the fluidization process of Geldart D particles, it is found that the drag and solid stress models based on the inertia number can more accurately describe the particle flow behavior in the 3D fluidized bed than the two-fluid model combined with traditional kinetic theory of granular flow and achieve a prediction accuracy close to CFD-DEM by presenting a nearly realistic bubble formation process. This provides a more computationally resource-efficient and effective tool for accurately modeling gas–solid two-phase flows at the reactor scale.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchVol. 63(50)
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology (CN)
Harbin Institute of Technology, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Granular flow and fluidized beds
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prediction of Particle Dynamics in Bubbling Fluidized Beds with Inertial Number-Based Drag and Solid Stress Models — Junnan Zhao, Xiaolong Yin, et al. · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS