Incidental mood affects decision under uncertainty: findings from an experiment with Nigerian farmers

Abstract Small farmers in low-and-middle-income countries are disproportionately affected by uncertainties under which they have to make decisions. However, decision-making may not be purely rational as it could be influenced by affective or emotional states. Compared to integral mood, there are few studies investigating whether incidental mood influences farmers’ monetary decisions under uncertainty. This paper applies the Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) model to determine farmers’ attitudes under uncertainty and examines the association with farmers mood, measured by direct elicitation during an experimental session. Participants (farmers) were mostly uncertainty averse in the gain domain. In contrast, farmers were uncertainty-seeking for losses. A one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the differences between groups in sad, neutral and happy mood states, followed by posthoc tests to determine which groups differed from each other. The results revealed statistically significant differences in uncertainty aversion, loss aversion, and the parameters representing how probabilities are perceived and weighted, i.e., sad, neutral and happy in the gain domain. However, there was an absence of a relationship between incidental mood and several CPT parameters in the loss domain. The paper highlights how understanding the association between mood and attitudes can be harnessed for a better quality of decision-making in various contexts. This finding has important implications for agricultural contexts where farmers often face uncertain outcomes and must make choices that involve potential gains and losses. Since the transfer of incidental moods to decision making is usually done unconsciously, it is crucial to eliminate or reduce the impact of negative moods on decision-making, especially where the outcome is likely to be suboptimal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Agriculture
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00132-0
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidental mood affects decision under uncertainty: findings from an experiment with Nigerian farmers

Tare Philip Daubry, Toritseju Begho
Discover Agriculture
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Incidental mood affects decision under uncertainty: findings from an experiment with Nigerian farmers

Tare Philip Daubry, Toritseju Begho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Small farmers in low-and-middle-income countries are disproportionately affected by uncertainties under which they have to make decisions. However, decision-making may not be purely rational as it could be influenced by affective or emotional states. Compared to integral mood, there are few studies investigating whether incidental mood influences farmers’ monetary decisions under uncertainty. This paper applies the Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) model to determine farmers’ attitudes under uncertainty and examines the association with farmers mood, measured by direct elicitation during an experimental session. Participants (farmers) were mostly uncertainty averse in the gain domain. In contrast, farmers were uncertainty-seeking for losses. A one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the differences between groups in sad, neutral and happy mood states, followed by posthoc tests to determine which groups differed from each other. The results revealed statistically significant differences in uncertainty aversion, loss aversion, and the parameters representing how probabilities are perceived and weighted, i.e., sad, neutral and happy in the gain domain. However, there was an absence of a relationship between incidental mood and several CPT parameters in the loss domain. The paper highlights how understanding the association between mood and attitudes can be harnessed for a better quality of decision-making in various contexts. This finding has important implications for agricultural contexts where farmers often face uncertain outcomes and must make choices that involve potential gains and losses. Since the transfer of incidental moods to decision making is usually done unconsciously, it is crucial to eliminate or reduce the impact of negative moods on decision-making, especially where the outcome is likely to be suboptimal.

Discover AgricultureVol. 2(1)
Scotland's Rural College (GB), Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.