Research on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Evidence Examination and Judgment

The application of artificial intelligence in the field of criminal evidence review and judgment has significant advantages, which are conducive to improving the efficiency of case processing, enhancing the reasoning ability of judicial personnel, and preventing judicial corruption. However, artificial intelligence is still facing a series of problems in its practical application in this field, including the inability of artificial intelligence to simulate the assessing process of probative value, the imperfect construction of the criminal evidence database of artificial intelligence, and the lack of clarity of the subject of responsibility for the misjudgment of criminal evidence by artificial intelligence. To this end, a series of measures should be taken to address these challenges, including clarifying the use of artificial intelligence for auxiliary examination of probative value, optimizing the criminal evidence database for artificial intelligence, and insisting on the status of judicial personnel as the main body of responsibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific journal of intelligent systems research.
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/1bw1jm50
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Evidence Examination and Judgment

Wenbo Zhu
Scientific journal of intelligent systems research.
Education, Law, and Society
article

Research on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Evidence Examination and Judgment

Wenbo Zhu
article en

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence in the field of criminal evidence review and judgment has significant advantages, which are conducive to improving the efficiency of case processing, enhancing the reasoning ability of judicial personnel, and preventing judicial corruption. However, artificial intelligence is still facing a series of problems in its practical application in this field, including the inability of artificial intelligence to simulate the assessing process of probative value, the imperfect construction of the criminal evidence database of artificial intelligence, and the lack of clarity of the subject of responsibility for the misjudgment of criminal evidence by artificial intelligence. To this end, a series of measures should be taken to address these challenges, including clarifying the use of artificial intelligence for auxiliary examination of probative value, optimizing the criminal evidence database for artificial intelligence, and insisting on the status of judicial personnel as the main body of responsibility.

Scientific journal of intelligent systems research.Vol. 6(11)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.