Impact of catheter location during mesenteric angiography in identifying sources of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of selective to superselective mesenteric angiography in identifying acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) after computed tomography angiography (CTA) demonstrating active arterial bleeding. Material and Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study of all patients who underwent mesenteric angiography to evaluate LGIB between January 2012 and September 2021. The inclusion criterion was a CTA demonstrating active arterial LGIB immediately before intervention. Patient demographics, etiology of bleeding, and procedural details were recorded. Selective angiography was defined as an ostial visceral branch injection; superselective was defined as any selection into or beyond a 2 nd order branch. Technical success was defined as the successful embolization of the target vessel. Clinical success was defined as the clinical resolution of gastrointestinal bleeding without additional procedural or surgical interventions within 30 days. Results: After inclusion criteria, 78 angiograms from 72 patients were evaluated. Active arterial bleeding was identified in 50% (39/78) of angiograms, and embolization was performed in 49% (38/78) of cases. The diagnostic sensitivity of superselective angiography was significantly greater than selective angiography (56.3% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.018). In 12.8% (10/78) of all angiograms, active bleeding was identified only with superselective angiography (25.6%, 10/39, of cases where any bleeding was identified). Embolization was performed in 38 of the angiograms; technical success was 97.4% (37/38), clinical success was 71.1% (27/38), and 26% (10/38) required further intervention. Embolization was not performed in 40 angiograms, with 68% (27/40) requiring an additional intervention. Conclusion: Superselective angiography is significantly more sensitive than selective angiography for patients with known acute LGIB identified on CTA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Interventional Radiology
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ajir_43_2024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of catheter location during mesenteric angiography in identifying sources of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding

James T. Patrie, Luke R. Wilkins, Patricia Zhao, D. Sheeran et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Interventional Radiology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
0.46
article

Impact of catheter location during mesenteric angiography in identifying sources of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding

James T. Patrie, Luke R. Wilkins, Patricia Zhao, D. Sheeran, William Joseph Lain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of selective to superselective mesenteric angiography in identifying acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) after computed tomography angiography (CTA) demonstrating active arterial bleeding. Material and Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study of all patients who underwent mesenteric angiography to evaluate LGIB between January 2012 and September 2021. The inclusion criterion was a CTA demonstrating active arterial LGIB immediately before intervention. Patient demographics, etiology of bleeding, and procedural details were recorded. Selective angiography was defined as an ostial visceral branch injection; superselective was defined as any selection into or beyond a 2 nd order branch. Technical success was defined as the successful embolization of the target vessel. Clinical success was defined as the clinical resolution of gastrointestinal bleeding without additional procedural or surgical interventions within 30 days. Results: After inclusion criteria, 78 angiograms from 72 patients were evaluated. Active arterial bleeding was identified in 50% (39/78) of angiograms, and embolization was performed in 49% (38/78) of cases. The diagnostic sensitivity of superselective angiography was significantly greater than selective angiography (56.3% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.018). In 12.8% (10/78) of all angiograms, active bleeding was identified only with superselective angiography (25.6%, 10/39, of cases where any bleeding was identified). Embolization was performed in 38 of the angiograms; technical success was 97.4% (37/38), clinical success was 71.1% (27/38), and 26% (10/38) required further intervention. Embolization was not performed in 40 angiograms, with 68% (27/40) requiring an additional intervention. Conclusion: Superselective angiography is significantly more sensitive than selective angiography for patients with known acute LGIB identified on CTA.

American Journal of Interventional RadiologyVol. 8
University of Virginia Health System (US), University of Virginia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.