Evaluation of pedotransfer functions to estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using machine learning with random forest and gradient boosting algorithms

Pedotransfer function (PTFs) is widely developed using machine learning algorithms (MLA) and non-linear regression (NLR). Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) is obviously used to regulate water movement in the soil. The objective of the work is to evaluate the accuracy of MLA to predict Ks. Moreover, is to determine the best class of predictors that can be used to predict Ks with little estimation error. Saturated hydraulic conductivity was measured by direct method using the constant head method. In addition, Ks was predicted using PTFs developed by machine learning algorithms including Random Forest Algorithm (RFA), and Gradient Boosting Algorithm (GBA) models with three categories of soil physical predictors. Furthermore, PTFs developed by RFA, and GBA were compared with PTFs developed by NLR models using the same three categories of soil physical predictors. The three categories of soil physical predictors were the following: category-1 refers to sand, silt, and clay “SSC”; category-2 refers to category-1, in addition to bulk density “SSC+BD”; and category-3 refers to category-2, in addition to organic matter “SSC+BD+OM”. The results of error analysis observed that PTFs developed by RFA were more accurate than GBA and NLR models, respectively, for Ks prediction with the three categories of soil physical predictors. Moreover, the category-3 which takes into account sand, silt, clay, bulk density, and organic matter was the best category used to predict Ks using RFA, and NLR models. PTFs developed by machine learning algorithms including RFA, and GBA models can be utilized to predict Ks with little calculation error. However, RFA was greater than GBA for calculating Ks. The efficiency of RFA was associated with the number of soil variables predictors and building classification and regression trees which is more robust than decision trees such as GBA to optimize Ks prediction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Soil & Environment
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25252/se/2024/253520
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of pedotransfer functions to estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using machine learning with random forest and gradient boosting algorithms

Ahmed Yehia Mady, M. A. Saeed, M. Abdel-Hamid, Lina A. Shalaby
3 citations
Soil & Environment
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
0.78
article

Evaluation of pedotransfer functions to estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using machine learning with random forest and gradient boosting algorithms

Ahmed Yehia Mady, M. A. Saeed, M. Abdel-Hamid, Lina A. Shalaby
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Pedotransfer function (PTFs) is widely developed using machine learning algorithms (MLA) and non-linear regression (NLR). Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) is obviously used to regulate water movement in the soil. The objective of the work is to evaluate the accuracy of MLA to predict Ks. Moreover, is to determine the best class of predictors that can be used to predict Ks with little estimation error. Saturated hydraulic conductivity was measured by direct method using the constant head method. In addition, Ks was predicted using PTFs developed by machine learning algorithms including Random Forest Algorithm (RFA), and Gradient Boosting Algorithm (GBA) models with three categories of soil physical predictors. Furthermore, PTFs developed by RFA, and GBA were compared with PTFs developed by NLR models using the same three categories of soil physical predictors. The three categories of soil physical predictors were the following: category-1 refers to sand, silt, and clay “SSC”; category-2 refers to category-1, in addition to bulk density “SSC+BD”; and category-3 refers to category-2, in addition to organic matter “SSC+BD+OM”. The results of error analysis observed that PTFs developed by RFA were more accurate than GBA and NLR models, respectively, for Ks prediction with the three categories of soil physical predictors. Moreover, the category-3 which takes into account sand, silt, clay, bulk density, and organic matter was the best category used to predict Ks using RFA, and NLR models. PTFs developed by machine learning algorithms including RFA, and GBA models can be utilized to predict Ks with little calculation error. However, RFA was greater than GBA for calculating Ks. The efficiency of RFA was associated with the number of soil variables predictors and building classification and regression trees which is more robust than decision trees such as GBA to optimize Ks prediction.

Soil & EnvironmentVol. 43(2)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.