Distributive Preferences and Fair Water Sharing Among Farmers in India

Using an experimental setting inspired by the empirical social choice literature, we analyze how Indian farmers define fair water allocation. We investigate the choices of 240 Indian farmers who — as a neutral third-party — are asked to make water allocation decisions in situations that differ, such as the agricultural area in which each farmer grows crops, the responsibilities of farmers in each agricultural area, and the nature of their water resource (lake versus river). Our findings highlight the impact of contextual variables: respondents tend to endorse equal water distribution when farmers have identical land sizes but lean toward proportional allocation when differences in land size exist. However, this inclination toward proportional allocation diminishes when discrepancies in land size result from farmers’ own decisions rather than external factors. Additionally, we uncover indications of a link between farmers’ inclinations toward pro-social behavior and their preference for proportional allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Economics and Policy
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2382624x24400058
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Economic Development in India
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distributive Preferences and Fair Water Sharing Among Farmers in India

Benjamin Ouvrard, Arnaud Reynaud, Murudaiah Sivamurthy
1 citations
Water Economics and Policy
Social and Economic Development in India
1.13
article

Distributive Preferences and Fair Water Sharing Among Farmers in India

Benjamin Ouvrard, Arnaud Reynaud, Murudaiah Sivamurthy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Using an experimental setting inspired by the empirical social choice literature, we analyze how Indian farmers define fair water allocation. We investigate the choices of 240 Indian farmers who — as a neutral third-party — are asked to make water allocation decisions in situations that differ, such as the agricultural area in which each farmer grows crops, the responsibilities of farmers in each agricultural area, and the nature of their water resource (lake versus river). Our findings highlight the impact of contextual variables: respondents tend to endorse equal water distribution when farmers have identical land sizes but lean toward proportional allocation when differences in land size exist. However, this inclination toward proportional allocation diminishes when discrepancies in land size result from farmers’ own decisions rather than external factors. Additionally, we uncover indications of a link between farmers’ inclinations toward pro-social behavior and their preference for proportional allocation.

Water Economics and PolicyVol. 11(01)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore (IN), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble (FR), Toulouse School of Economics (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Zero hunger, Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Social and Economic Development in India
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.