Effect of Addition of Pressure Biofeedback Training to Conventional Rehabilitation Protocol on Dynamic Balance and Back Extensor Endurance in Individuals Underwent Lower Limb Surgery

BACKGROUND: Study collate and summarise individual studies contains information about "effectiveness of pressure biofeedback training to conventional rehabilitation protocol on dynamic balance and back extensor endurance in individuals underwent lower limb surgery" PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To summarize effectiveness of pressure biofeedback training to conventional rehabilitation protocol on dynamic balance and back extensor endurance in individuals underwent lower limb surgery" DESIGN: A Randomized Controlled Trial SUBJECTS: 30 subjects who underwent any surgical procedure of lower limb.Participants were divided conveniently 15 in all the two groups.METHOD: Individuals who have undergone any type of lower limb surgery were designated for the research.With fifteen patients in each group, the subjects were split into two groups: Group B underwent standard rehabilitation treatment alone for three weeks, whereas Group A received pressure biofeedback training in addition to it.The dynamic balancing component of the SEBT is utilized to measure outcome, while the back extensor endurance component is measured using the Biering Sorensen Test.Over the course of three weeks, a total of twenty-one days were dedicated to administering the procedure to the participants.RESULT: Data analysis was accomplished with following software: Microsoft EXCEL (Professional Edition 2007; Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA) and Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS version 20).Paired t-test (parametric test) was used to compare the changes in the Dynamic Balance & Extensor Endurance within the groups and independent t-test was used to compare baseline values of age and readings of Dynamic Balance & Extensor Endurance and also the final between the group measures of Dynamic Balance & Extensor Endurance among the participants of Group A and B. A statistically significant difference was defined as 'p' value was less than 0.001.CONCLUSION: Our data revealed that Group A is more effective in improving all variables.The experimental hypothesis was accepted based on the results, and the study concluded that Pressure Biofeedback was more effective in retraining back and core muscles and improving mobility, stability, and strength when combined with conventional rehabilitation protocol alone following lower limb surgeries.