Reconsidering Sport Diplomacy: The 2020/1 Tokyo Olympics and ‘Soft-Power’

The paper seeks to examine how sport mega-events can be utilized as a form of soft-power to further national unification, nation branding and international relations in the arena of sport diplomacy. Focusing on the 1964 and 2020/1 Tokyo Olympics, the paper critically analyses how the idea of soft power in the 2020/1 Games has become controversial. The paper explores how business oriented top-down Olympic diplomacy creates tensions, and value conflicts about the political, economic, and human life priorities between the organizers and Japanese citizens under the exigencies of the Covid-19 pandemic. The paper also compares the gender discourses employed in the Olympics, since women’s performance in the Olympics can be seen as a vehicle of soft-power. The different gender politics are explored along with the impact of contemporary new media environments which created intensive public engagement about anti-gender inequality. These concerns indicate that the Olympics which are driven by the government and the IOC, no longer function as simple forms of soft-power designed to unify people, rather ‘soft-power’ is mobilized to unite multilateral profit-oriented business stakeholders and enhance the over-commercialized Olympics as well. Hence the question of what the general virtue of the Olympics should be, remains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Sport History & Culture
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/27690148.2024.2430187
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering Sport Diplomacy: The 2020/1 Tokyo Olympics and ‘Soft-Power’

Tomoko Tamari
2 citations
Asian Journal of Sport History & Culture
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
2.26
article

Reconsidering Sport Diplomacy: The 2020/1 Tokyo Olympics and ‘Soft-Power’

Tomoko Tamari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The paper seeks to examine how sport mega-events can be utilized as a form of soft-power to further national unification, nation branding and international relations in the arena of sport diplomacy. Focusing on the 1964 and 2020/1 Tokyo Olympics, the paper critically analyses how the idea of soft power in the 2020/1 Games has become controversial. The paper explores how business oriented top-down Olympic diplomacy creates tensions, and value conflicts about the political, economic, and human life priorities between the organizers and Japanese citizens under the exigencies of the Covid-19 pandemic. The paper also compares the gender discourses employed in the Olympics, since women’s performance in the Olympics can be seen as a vehicle of soft-power. The different gender politics are explored along with the impact of contemporary new media environments which created intensive public engagement about anti-gender inequality. These concerns indicate that the Olympics which are driven by the government and the IOC, no longer function as simple forms of soft-power designed to unify people, rather ‘soft-power’ is mobilized to unite multilateral profit-oriented business stakeholders and enhance the over-commercialized Olympics as well. Hence the question of what the general virtue of the Olympics should be, remains.

Asian Journal of Sport History & CultureVol. 4(1)
Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.