Roundtable: judgemental rationality in the critical realist project

The article is a lightly edited transcript of a digital roundtable discussion. The participants were invited based on their prior work on critical realism and epistemology. The roundtable discussion includes introductory statements on judgemental rationality by Jamie Morgan, Ruth Groff, Dorothea Schoppek, Leigh Price, and Frédéric Vandenberghe, followed by a discussion between the participants on a variety of topics related to judgemental rationality. The discussion demonstrates a variety of opinions and perspectives, as well as the clashing of opinions in a respectful manner. The roundtable provides interesting discussion points about Bhaskar's approach to judgemental rationality, how we adjudicate between different meta-theories (such as between that of Bhaskar and Harré), and what role should normative values have in theoretical adjudication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Realism
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2024.2435090
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Roundtable: judgemental rationality in the critical realist project

Jamie Morgan, Leigh Price, Ruth Groff, Dorothea Elena Schoppek et al.
4 citations
Journal of Critical Realism
Political Philosophy and Ethics
8.92
article

Roundtable: judgemental rationality in the critical realist project

Jamie Morgan, Leigh Price, Ruth Groff, Dorothea Elena Schoppek, Robert Isaksen, Frédéric Vandenberghe
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The article is a lightly edited transcript of a digital roundtable discussion. The participants were invited based on their prior work on critical realism and epistemology. The roundtable discussion includes introductory statements on judgemental rationality by Jamie Morgan, Ruth Groff, Dorothea Schoppek, Leigh Price, and Frédéric Vandenberghe, followed by a discussion between the participants on a variety of topics related to judgemental rationality. The discussion demonstrates a variety of opinions and perspectives, as well as the clashing of opinions in a respectful manner. The roundtable provides interesting discussion points about Bhaskar's approach to judgemental rationality, how we adjudicate between different meta-theories (such as between that of Bhaskar and Harré), and what role should normative values have in theoretical adjudication.

Journal of Critical RealismVol. 23(5)
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), University of Inland Norway (NO), Hamburg Institut (Germany) (DE), Institute for Advanced Study (DE), Saint Louis University (US), Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
8.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Roundtable: judgemental rationality in the critical realist project — Jamie Morgan, Leigh Price, et al. · Journal of Critical Realism (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS