Roundtable: judgemental rationality in the critical realist project
The article is a lightly edited transcript of a digital roundtable discussion. The participants were invited based on their prior work on critical realism and epistemology. The roundtable discussion includes introductory statements on judgemental rationality by Jamie Morgan, Ruth Groff, Dorothea Schoppek, Leigh Price, and Frédéric Vandenberghe, followed by a discussion between the participants on a variety of topics related to judgemental rationality. The discussion demonstrates a variety of opinions and perspectives, as well as the clashing of opinions in a respectful manner. The roundtable provides interesting discussion points about Bhaskar's approach to judgemental rationality, how we adjudicate between different meta-theories (such as between that of Bhaskar and Harré), and what role should normative values have in theoretical adjudication.
Authors
- Jamie Morgan
- Leigh Price (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-3402)
- Ruth Groff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3053-4068)
- Dorothea Elena Schoppek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-2687)
- Robert Isaksen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9358-3433)
- Frédéric Vandenberghe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0614-8420)
Institutions
- Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
- Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
- University of Inland Norway (NO)
- Hamburg Institut (Germany) (DE)
- Institute for Advanced Study (DE)
- Saint Louis University (US)
- Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Critical Realism
- Published
- 2024-10-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2024.2435090
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.92