PFOS and Its Commercial Alternative, 6:2 Cl-PFESA, Induce Multidrug Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), specifically perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and its alternative, 2-[(6-chloro-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6-dodecafluorohexyl)oxy]-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethanesulfonic acid (6:2 Cl-PFESA), are associated with environmental health concerns and potential cancer progression. However, their impact on multidrug resistance (MDR) in pancreatic cancer (PC) chemotherapy remains unclear. Here, we employed drug-sensitivity assays, including IC<sub>50</sub> calculations, <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> models with various chemotherapeutics, and paclitaxel (PTX) as a representative agent, combined with transcriptomic/proteomic sequencing and clinical prognostic analysis, to identify MDR-related genes and validate their relevance, with the objective of establishing the correlation between PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure and MDR in PC at molecular, cellular, and animal model levels. Our findings demonstrate that PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure increases the drug IC<sub>50</sub> in three different PC cell lines for various chemotherapeutic agents. Compared with PFOS, 6:2 Cl-PFESA demonstrated a more pro-MDR effect on PC cells <i>in vitro</i>. <i>In vivo</i> experiments further revealed that PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposures significantly reduced the efficacy of PTX in PC, with inhibition rates dropping from 78.3% to 23.8%/6.1%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This effect was driven by the aberrant activation of the PI3K-ABCB1 pathway, with 6:2 Cl-PFESA demonstrating a stronger capacity to promote this signal pathway's expression and function compared with PFOS. These data suggest that exposure to PFAS may elevate the risk of MDR and subsequent disease progression. Although marketed as a safer alternative to PFOS, the notable impact of 6:2 Cl-PFESA on MDR highlights the necessity for a comprehensive assessment of its potential carcinogenic risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08669
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PFOS and Its Commercial Alternative, 6:2 Cl-PFESA, Induce Multidrug Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer

Keyi Du, Hangbiao Jin, Hanxi Yu, Yuanchen Chen et al.
8 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
2.26
article

PFOS and Its Commercial Alternative, 6:2 Cl-PFESA, Induce Multidrug Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer

Keyi Du, Hangbiao Jin, Hanxi Yu, Yuanchen Chen, Tong Wu, Wei Du, Weichen Zhang, Liang Zhao, Jiawei Hong, Shusen Zheng, Yifan Jiang, Linping Cao, Tingting Pan
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), specifically perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and its alternative, 2-[(6-chloro-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6-dodecafluorohexyl)oxy]-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethanesulfonic acid (6:2 Cl-PFESA), are associated with environmental health concerns and potential cancer progression. However, their impact on multidrug resistance (MDR) in pancreatic cancer (PC) chemotherapy remains unclear. Here, we employed drug-sensitivity assays, including IC<sub>50</sub> calculations, <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> models with various chemotherapeutics, and paclitaxel (PTX) as a representative agent, combined with transcriptomic/proteomic sequencing and clinical prognostic analysis, to identify MDR-related genes and validate their relevance, with the objective of establishing the correlation between PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure and MDR in PC at molecular, cellular, and animal model levels. Our findings demonstrate that PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure increases the drug IC<sub>50</sub> in three different PC cell lines for various chemotherapeutic agents. Compared with PFOS, 6:2 Cl-PFESA demonstrated a more pro-MDR effect on PC cells <i>in vitro</i>. <i>In vivo</i> experiments further revealed that PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposures significantly reduced the efficacy of PTX in PC, with inhibition rates dropping from 78.3% to 23.8%/6.1%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This effect was driven by the aberrant activation of the PI3K-ABCB1 pathway, with 6:2 Cl-PFESA demonstrating a stronger capacity to promote this signal pathway's expression and function compared with PFOS. These data suggest that exposure to PFAS may elevate the risk of MDR and subsequent disease progression. Although marketed as a safer alternative to PFOS, the notable impact of 6:2 Cl-PFESA on MDR highlights the necessity for a comprehensive assessment of its potential carcinogenic risks.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 58(50)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Blood Center of Zhejiang Province (CN), Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN), First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.