Physics-Assisted Machine Learning Models for Predicting Pool Boiling Critical Heat Flux for Cryogenic Fluids

Abstract Cryogenic fluid management is highly crucial for NASAs space missions and one challenge identified by NASA is the tank fill process for pure cryogenic fluids. To date, no predictive tool can accurately estimate the pool boiling curve during this process. We aim to address this gap by first accurately predicting critical heat flux. We use both traditional machine learning and physics-assisted machine learning methods to predict critical heat flux on a large dataset of 1322 datapoints from 53 published studies with a wide range of operational conditions and surface properties. While the traditional machine learning approach used no prior knowledge in modeling, the physics-assisted machine learning approach assumes the correlation form of the Zuber instability model (Zuber, N., 1958, “On the stability of boiling heat transfer,” ASME Trans. ASME., 80(3), pp. 711–714) and predicts the multiplier for the hydrodynamic instability term to estimate the critical heat flux. Two groups of input features are compared including one with fluid-only properties and another with both fluid and solid surface properties. Various feature selection methods are employed to reduce the redundant features, and multiple machine learning models are used for modeling the dataset. Physics-assisted machine learning methods predict much better than traditional machine learning methods. The inclusion of solid properties further improves the predictions of critical heat flux across all models using physics-assisted method. Machine learning models are more stable when using physics-assisted methods compared to traditional methods. The best predictions are obtained using the extreme gradient boosting model based on the physics-assisted machine learning method resulting in a mean absolute percentage error of 8.88% which is far better than the semi-empirical correlations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067339
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-Assisted Machine Learning Models for Predicting Pool Boiling Critical Heat Flux for Cryogenic Fluids

Chirag R. Kharangate, Jiayuan Li
4 citations
ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
5.20
article

Physics-Assisted Machine Learning Models for Predicting Pool Boiling Critical Heat Flux for Cryogenic Fluids

Chirag R. Kharangate, Jiayuan Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Cryogenic fluid management is highly crucial for NASAs space missions and one challenge identified by NASA is the tank fill process for pure cryogenic fluids. To date, no predictive tool can accurately estimate the pool boiling curve during this process. We aim to address this gap by first accurately predicting critical heat flux. We use both traditional machine learning and physics-assisted machine learning methods to predict critical heat flux on a large dataset of 1322 datapoints from 53 published studies with a wide range of operational conditions and surface properties. While the traditional machine learning approach used no prior knowledge in modeling, the physics-assisted machine learning approach assumes the correlation form of the Zuber instability model (Zuber, N., 1958, “On the stability of boiling heat transfer,” ASME Trans. ASME., 80(3), pp. 711–714) and predicts the multiplier for the hydrodynamic instability term to estimate the critical heat flux. Two groups of input features are compared including one with fluid-only properties and another with both fluid and solid surface properties. Various feature selection methods are employed to reduce the redundant features, and multiple machine learning models are used for modeling the dataset. Physics-assisted machine learning methods predict much better than traditional machine learning methods. The inclusion of solid properties further improves the predictions of critical heat flux across all models using physics-assisted method. Machine learning models are more stable when using physics-assisted methods compared to traditional methods. The best predictions are obtained using the extreme gradient boosting model based on the physics-assisted machine learning method resulting in a mean absolute percentage error of 8.88% which is far better than the semi-empirical correlations.

ASME Journal of Heat and Mass TransferVol. 147(4)
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
5.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.