The internationalization of Chinese social sciences research: publication, collaboration, and citation patterns in economics, education, and political science

Despite recent Chinese government policies aiming to balanceinternational and national publishing patterns, the enduringimpact on China’s global engagements, publications, andcollaborations remains uncertain. Analyzing 8,962 publicationsfrom Scopus between 2016 and 2020, the paper assessespublication, collaboration, and citation patterns among the top500 productive China-affiliated scholars within Economics,Education, and Political Science. Results indicate that publicationsare primarily in Western journals, with Political Science oftenfocusing on China-specific issues, suggesting potential ‘silos’. Co-authorship patterns show Western dominance, with diverseinternational collaborations in Education and Economics, butmore national-focused in Political Science. The paper concludeswith discussions on practical implications and study limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Reviews in Higher Education
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2024.2438240
Citations
5
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The internationalization of Chinese social sciences research: publication, collaboration, and citation patterns in economics, education, and political science

Xin Xu, Manuel Goyanes, Gergő Háló, Márton Demeter
5 citations
Policy Reviews in Higher Education
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
2.31
article

The internationalization of Chinese social sciences research: publication, collaboration, and citation patterns in economics, education, and political science

Xin Xu, Manuel Goyanes, Gergő Háló, Márton Demeter
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Despite recent Chinese government policies aiming to balanceinternational and national publishing patterns, the enduringimpact on China’s global engagements, publications, andcollaborations remains uncertain. Analyzing 8,962 publicationsfrom Scopus between 2016 and 2020, the paper assessespublication, collaboration, and citation patterns among the top500 productive China-affiliated scholars within Economics,Education, and Political Science. Results indicate that publicationsare primarily in Western journals, with Political Science oftenfocusing on China-specific issues, suggesting potential ‘silos’. Co-authorship patterns show Western dominance, with diverseinternational collaborations in Education and Economics, butmore national-focused in Political Science. The paper concludeswith discussions on practical implications and study limitations.

Policy Reviews in Higher EducationVol. 9(1)
Ludovika University of Public Service (HU), University of Oxford (GB), Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.