Detachment of the Subducting Slab in Ancient Subduction Zones Discerned Using Machine Learning

Abstract Identification of complex geochemical signatures of basalts from various tectonic settings using trace elements contents is still challenging due to uncertainties in existing classification diagrams and machine‐learning attempts. To address this, we trained a machine‐learning model using a random forest classifier on trace element concentrations of a global basalt‐dataset, categorized by types of tectonic plate boundary—destructive or constructive—at which they formed. Achieving an accuracy exceeding 98%, the model efficiently extracts the distinctive characteristics from each basalt type. When applied to the Bangong‐Nujiang suture zone in central Tibet, the model reveals that the basalts exhibited features of both boundary types prior to 108–107 Ma before transitioning to solely destructive characteristics. This transition is likely to be caused by the detachment of a descending oceanic slab, aligning with existing geological evidence. This case study highlights the promising potential of machine learning models, trained on simplified basalt types, in more accurately tracing lithospheric evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jh000400
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detachment of the Subducting Slab in Ancient Subduction Zones Discerned Using Machine Learning

Yunchuan Zeng, Alexander R.L. Nichols, Anlin Ma, Feng Zi et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
0.35
article

Detachment of the Subducting Slab in Ancient Subduction Zones Discerned Using Machine Learning

Yunchuan Zeng, Alexander R.L. Nichols, Anlin Ma, Feng Zi, Quan Ou, Jia Liao, Sheng‐Ping Qian, Zongying Huang, Dan Zheng, Z.‐Q. Hou, Kun Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Identification of complex geochemical signatures of basalts from various tectonic settings using trace elements contents is still challenging due to uncertainties in existing classification diagrams and machine‐learning attempts. To address this, we trained a machine‐learning model using a random forest classifier on trace element concentrations of a global basalt‐dataset, categorized by types of tectonic plate boundary—destructive or constructive—at which they formed. Achieving an accuracy exceeding 98%, the model efficiently extracts the distinctive characteristics from each basalt type. When applied to the Bangong‐Nujiang suture zone in central Tibet, the model reveals that the basalts exhibited features of both boundary types prior to 108–107 Ma before transitioning to solely destructive characteristics. This transition is likely to be caused by the detachment of a descending oceanic slab, aligning with existing geological evidence. This case study highlights the promising potential of machine learning models, trained on simplified basalt types, in more accurately tracing lithospheric evolution.

Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and ComputationVol. 1(4)
Hunan University of Science and Technology (CN), University of Canterbury (NZ), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), China Geological Survey (CN), Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Chengdu University of Technology (CN), State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (CN), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu University, Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.