Comparison of 6 cycles of isatuximab with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (I-VRd) versus 3 cycles of I-VRd followed by one cycle of high-dose melphalan in newly diagnosed low-risk multiple myeloma. Protocol for a multicenter, prospective,

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are eligible for transplant usually receive several induction cycles of therapy, followed by one or two cycles of high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transfusion. In myeloma patients, high-dose melphalan improves overall survival and progression-free survival. However, melphalan exposure increases the risk of secondary malignancies and may lead to the transformation of residual myeloma cells into more aggressive clones, which may accelerate relapse. It remains to be determined whether low-risk patients also derive additional benefit from high-dose melphalan therapy compared with less toxic regimens. Here we publish the study protocol of a multicenter, interventional, controlled, randomized, prospective and open-label phase II trial to investigate whether patients with a low-risk profile (R-ISS stage I, characterized by a low tumor burden and the absence of negative cytogenetic findings or elevated LDH levels) and a standard-risk gene expression profile (using the SKY92 GEP assay) can be sufficiently treated with intensified consolidation regimens without prior high-dose melphalan chemotherapy. The primary objective is to assess whether three cycles of isatuximab, bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (I-VRd) followed by stem cell apheresis and three additional cycles of I-VRd will result in a non-inferior rate of complete remission (CR) combined with MRD-negativity at week 40 after the start of induction therapy compared to three cycles of I-VRd followed by standard of care treatment (such as stem cell apheresis, high-dose melphalan, and autologous stem cell transplantation). We hypothesize that this approach could reduce toxicity, cost of treatment and the likelihood of the development of a more malignant plasma cell clone, while improving overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed low risk myeloma patients. EU Trial Number 2022-500453-16-00, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05665140 , identifier NCT05665140. Registration Date: 21.07.2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Hematology
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frhem.2024.1436845
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of 6 cycles of isatuximab with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (I-VRd) versus 3 cycles of I-VRd followed by one cycle of high-dose melphalan in newly diagnosed low-risk multiple myeloma. Protocol for a multicenter, prospective,

Marion Högner, Raphael Koch, Katja Christina Weisel, Leo Rasche et al.
Frontiers in Hematology
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Comparison of 6 cycles of isatuximab with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (I-VRd) versus 3 cycles of I-VRd followed by one cycle of high-dose melphalan in newly diagnosed low-risk multiple myeloma. Protocol for a multicenter, prospective,

Marion Högner, Raphael Koch, Katja Christina Weisel, Leo Rasche, Inke Regina König, Stefan Knop, Jan Krönke, Karl L. Horn, Cyrus Khandanpour, Kai Wegehenkel, Christina Schwitlick, Florian C. Bassermann, Theo Leitner, Frank C. Hamm, K. Martin Kortüm, Axel Nogai, Nikolas C. C. von Bubnoff, Maren Vens, Evgenii Shumilov, Martin Görner, Hermann Einsele
article en

Abstract

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are eligible for transplant usually receive several induction cycles of therapy, followed by one or two cycles of high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transfusion. In myeloma patients, high-dose melphalan improves overall survival and progression-free survival. However, melphalan exposure increases the risk of secondary malignancies and may lead to the transformation of residual myeloma cells into more aggressive clones, which may accelerate relapse. It remains to be determined whether low-risk patients also derive additional benefit from high-dose melphalan therapy compared with less toxic regimens. Here we publish the study protocol of a multicenter, interventional, controlled, randomized, prospective and open-label phase II trial to investigate whether patients with a low-risk profile (R-ISS stage I, characterized by a low tumor burden and the absence of negative cytogenetic findings or elevated LDH levels) and a standard-risk gene expression profile (using the SKY92 GEP assay) can be sufficiently treated with intensified consolidation regimens without prior high-dose melphalan chemotherapy. The primary objective is to assess whether three cycles of isatuximab, bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (I-VRd) followed by stem cell apheresis and three additional cycles of I-VRd will result in a non-inferior rate of complete remission (CR) combined with MRD-negativity at week 40 after the start of induction therapy compared to three cycles of I-VRd followed by standard of care treatment (such as stem cell apheresis, high-dose melphalan, and autologous stem cell transplantation). We hypothesize that this approach could reduce toxicity, cost of treatment and the likelihood of the development of a more malignant plasma cell clone, while improving overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed low risk myeloma patients. EU Trial Number 2022-500453-16-00, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05665140 , identifier NCT05665140. Registration Date: 21.07.2022.

Frontiers in HematologyVol. 3
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Münster (DE), TUM Klinikum (DE), University Hospital Münster (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Klinikum Bielefeld (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.