The development of social attention in orangutans: Comparing peering behavior in wild and zoo-housed individuals

Social learning plays an essential role in all cultural processes, but the factors underlying its evolution remain poorly understood. To understand how socio-ecological conditions affect social learning, we compared peering behavior (i.e., close-range observation of conspecifics' activities) in wild and zoo-housed Sumatran orangutans. Using long-term data describing over 3,000 peering events (performed by 65 individuals across settings), we found similar age trajectories of peering in both settings. Moreover, immatures universally preferred to peer at older individuals and in learning-intense contexts. However, zoo-housed immatures peered more frequently, and more at non-mother individuals than their wild conspecifics, even when social opportunities were controlled for. Therefore, although similarities across settings suggest that the tendency to attend to social information has hard-wired components, the differences indicate that it is also influenced by social opportunities and the necessity to learn. Our comparative approach thus provides evidence that socio-ecological factors and genetic predispositions underlie the dynamics and evolution of culture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111542
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Primate Behavior and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The development of social attention in orangutans: Comparing peering behavior in wild and zoo-housed individuals

Daniel B. M. Haun, Shauhin E. Alavi, Julia A. Kunz, Tri Rahmaeti et al.
2 citations
iScience
Primate Behavior and Ecology
1.29
article

The development of social attention in orangutans: Comparing peering behavior in wild and zoo-housed individuals

Daniel B. M. Haun, Shauhin E. Alavi, Julia A. Kunz, Tri Rahmaeti, Caroline Schuppli, Fitriah Basalamah, Lara Nellissen, Richard Young, Paulina Kukofka
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Social learning plays an essential role in all cultural processes, but the factors underlying its evolution remain poorly understood. To understand how socio-ecological conditions affect social learning, we compared peering behavior (i.e., close-range observation of conspecifics' activities) in wild and zoo-housed Sumatran orangutans. Using long-term data describing over 3,000 peering events (performed by 65 individuals across settings), we found similar age trajectories of peering in both settings. Moreover, immatures universally preferred to peer at older individuals and in learning-intense contexts. However, zoo-housed immatures peered more frequently, and more at non-mother individuals than their wild conspecifics, even when social opportunities were controlled for. Therefore, although similarities across settings suggest that the tendency to attend to social information has hard-wired components, the differences indicate that it is also influenced by social opportunities and the necessity to learn. Our comparative approach thus provides evidence that socio-ecological factors and genetic predispositions underlie the dynamics and evolution of culture.

iScienceVol. 28(1)
University of Konstanz (DE), Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (FR), Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior (DE), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE), Éco-Anthropologie (FR), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES), University of Neuchâtel (CH), Nasional University (ID)
Universitas Nasional, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Universität Zürich, A.H. Schultz-Stiftung zur Förderung Primatologischer Forschung, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Primate Behavior and Ecology
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.