Impact of Iron(II) Concentration and Sequential Addition of Metal(loids) on the Removal of Aqueous Antimony and Arsenic <?A3B2 pi6?>Through Microbial Sulfate Reduction

<p indent="0mm"> Different Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations (10, 20, 50, 100, 200 and <sc>500 mg/L),</sc> antimony (Sb), and arsenic (As) species (i.e. Sb(V) + As(V) and Sb(III) + As(III), <sc>5 mg/L)</sc> were introduced to batch experiments of microbial sulfate reduction at different intervals. The changes in physicochemical parameters such as pH, redox potential (Eh), total alkalinity, SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>, sulfides, and variations in Fe, Sb, or As concentrations were analyzed at <sc>0.5 h</sc> and on the 7<sup>th</sup> day after Sb and As addition to elucidate the effects of Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations and the adding sequence of Fe<sup>2+</sup>, Sb and As on the efficiency and mechanisms of microbial sulfate reduction to remove aqueous Sb and As. Results indicated that compared to the adding sequence, Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentration had a more significant impact on the removal efficiency. Lower Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations <sc>(≤20 mg/L)</sc> did not promote As removal. In comparison, higher Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations <sc>(≥50 mg/L)</sc> significantly improved As removal efficiency. Antimony removal exceeded 95% for all treatments, so the effects of adding sequences and Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations on Sb removal were challenging to delineate. When treating Sb and As containing wastewater through microbial sulfate reduction, the addition of Fe<sup>2+</sup> should be considered to enhance removal efficiency. Similarly, the environmental behavior of Fe-bearing minerals needs to be better considered when treating Sb- and As-contaminated sediments or soils by enhanced microbial sulfur reduction to achieve more significant remediation results.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3724/ee.1672-9250.2024.52.022
Primary Topic
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Iron(II) Concentration and Sequential Addition of Metal(loids) on the Removal of Aqueous Antimony and Arsenic &lt;?A3B2 pi6?&gt;Through Microbial Sulfate Reduction

Xuqiang Luo, Guoping Zhang, Fengjuan Liu, Lu Yu et al.
EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
article

Impact of Iron(II) Concentration and Sequential Addition of Metal(loids) on the Removal of Aqueous Antimony and Arsenic &lt;?A3B2 pi6?&gt;Through Microbial Sulfate Reduction

Xuqiang Luo, Guoping Zhang, Fengjuan Liu, Lu Yu, Q.H. Zhang
article en

Abstract

<p indent="0mm"> Different Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations (10, 20, 50, 100, 200 and <sc>500 mg/L),</sc> antimony (Sb), and arsenic (As) species (i.e. Sb(V) + As(V) and Sb(III) + As(III), <sc>5 mg/L)</sc> were introduced to batch experiments of microbial sulfate reduction at different intervals. The changes in physicochemical parameters such as pH, redox potential (Eh), total alkalinity, SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>, sulfides, and variations in Fe, Sb, or As concentrations were analyzed at <sc>0.5 h</sc> and on the 7<sup>th</sup> day after Sb and As addition to elucidate the effects of Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations and the adding sequence of Fe<sup>2+</sup>, Sb and As on the efficiency and mechanisms of microbial sulfate reduction to remove aqueous Sb and As. Results indicated that compared to the adding sequence, Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentration had a more significant impact on the removal efficiency. Lower Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations <sc>(≤20 mg/L)</sc> did not promote As removal. In comparison, higher Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations <sc>(≥50 mg/L)</sc> significantly improved As removal efficiency. Antimony removal exceeded 95% for all treatments, so the effects of adding sequences and Fe<sup>2+</sup> concentrations on Sb removal were challenging to delineate. When treating Sb and As containing wastewater through microbial sulfate reduction, the addition of Fe<sup>2+</sup> should be considered to enhance removal efficiency. Similarly, the environmental behavior of Fe-bearing minerals needs to be better considered when treating Sb- and As-contaminated sediments or soils by enhanced microbial sulfur reduction to achieve more significant remediation results.

EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTVol. 52(5)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.