From the ground up: Perspectives from “Thinking Writing” classrooms on the critical creative nexus

The “Thinking Writing: Theory and Creativity” postgraduate course at the University of Melbourne asks creative writing students to consider, and practice, the critical-creative nexus. The core questions of the syllabus are: what is the relationship between ideas and practice, between critical and creative, between thinking and writing? Running since 2009, the course sits among many Australian university creative writing programs that aim to equip their students with knowledge of cultural and literary theory. But why is this necessary? And why do many creative writers still find their encounter with capital ‘t’, Theory, so challenging? Our paper explores some of these encounters through a polyvocal enactment, using the experiences of three instructors of “Thinking Writing” to unpack the problematics, inadequacies and fears raised by attempting to be critical theorists and creative writers at the same time. Focussing on historical and personal anecdote as its primary site of elucidation, we map different moments when clarity struck as we find models for how creativity should interact with theory neither singular nor linear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TEXT
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.126958
Primary Topic
Artistic and Creative Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the ground up: Perspectives from “Thinking Writing” classrooms on the critical creative nexus

Jessica Yu, Rachel Hennessy, Elizabeth MacFarlane
TEXT
Artistic and Creative Research
article

From the ground up: Perspectives from “Thinking Writing” classrooms on the critical creative nexus

Jessica Yu, Rachel Hennessy, Elizabeth MacFarlane
article en

Abstract

The “Thinking Writing: Theory and Creativity” postgraduate course at the University of Melbourne asks creative writing students to consider, and practice, the critical-creative nexus. The core questions of the syllabus are: what is the relationship between ideas and practice, between critical and creative, between thinking and writing? Running since 2009, the course sits among many Australian university creative writing programs that aim to equip their students with knowledge of cultural and literary theory. But why is this necessary? And why do many creative writers still find their encounter with capital ‘t’, Theory, so challenging? Our paper explores some of these encounters through a polyvocal enactment, using the experiences of three instructors of “Thinking Writing” to unpack the problematics, inadequacies and fears raised by attempting to be critical theorists and creative writers at the same time. Focussing on historical and personal anecdote as its primary site of elucidation, we map different moments when clarity struck as we find models for how creativity should interact with theory neither singular nor linear.

TEXTVol. 28(Special 73)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Artistic and Creative Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From the ground up: Perspectives from “Thinking Writing” classrooms on the critical creative nexus — Jessica Yu, Rachel Hennessy, et al. · TEXT (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS