Analytical Performance of a Novel Nanopore Sequencing for SARS‐CoV‐2 Genomic Surveillance

The genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 has served as a crucial tool for generating invaluable data that fulfils both epidemiological and clinical necessities. Long-read sequencing technology (e.g., ONT) has been widely used, providing a real-time and faster response when necessitated. A novel nanopore-based long-read sequencing platform named QNome nanopore has been successfully used for bacterial genome sequencing and assembly; however, its performance in the SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is still lacking. Synthetic SARS-CoV-2 controls and 120 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples that tested positive by real-time polymerase chain reaction were sequenced on both QNome and MGI platforms in parallel. The analytical performance of QNome was compared to the short-read sequencing on MGI. For the synthetic SARS-CoV-2 controls, despite the increased error rates observed in QNome nanopore sequencing reads, accurate consensus-level sequence determination was achieved with an average mapping quality score of approximately 60 (i.e., a mapping accuracy of 99.9999%). For the NPS samples, the average genomic coverage was 89.35% on the QNome nanopore platform compared with 90.39% for MGI. In addition, fewer consensus genomes from QNome were determined to be good by Nextclade compare with MGI (p < 0.05). A total of 9004 mutations were identified using QNome sequencing, with substitutions being the most prevalent, in contrast, 10 997 mutations were detected on MGI (p < 0.05). Furthermore, 23 large deletions (i.e., deletions≥ 10 bp) were identified by QNome while 19/23 were supported by evidence from short-read sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the Pango lineage of consensus genomes for SARS-CoV-2 sequenced by QNome concorded 83.04% with MGI. QNome nanopore sequencing, though challenged by read quality and accuracy compared to MGI, is overcoming these issues through bioinformatics and computational advances. The advantage of structure variation (SV) detection capabilities and real-time data analysis renders it a promising alternative nanopore platform for the surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Virology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.70108
Citations
3
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical Performance of a Novel Nanopore Sequencing for SARS‐CoV‐2 Genomic Surveillance

Lijun Jin, Mireguli Maimaiti, Wenhu Guo, Yiwei Liu et al.
3 citations
Journal of Medical Virology
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
1.17
article

Analytical Performance of a Novel Nanopore Sequencing for SARS‐CoV‐2 Genomic Surveillance

Lijun Jin, Mireguli Maimaiti, Wenhu Guo, Yiwei Liu, Qi Yu, Lingjun Kong, Chenglin Yang, Jie Yi, Ziyi Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 has served as a crucial tool for generating invaluable data that fulfils both epidemiological and clinical necessities. Long-read sequencing technology (e.g., ONT) has been widely used, providing a real-time and faster response when necessitated. A novel nanopore-based long-read sequencing platform named QNome nanopore has been successfully used for bacterial genome sequencing and assembly; however, its performance in the SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is still lacking. Synthetic SARS-CoV-2 controls and 120 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples that tested positive by real-time polymerase chain reaction were sequenced on both QNome and MGI platforms in parallel. The analytical performance of QNome was compared to the short-read sequencing on MGI. For the synthetic SARS-CoV-2 controls, despite the increased error rates observed in QNome nanopore sequencing reads, accurate consensus-level sequence determination was achieved with an average mapping quality score of approximately 60 (i.e., a mapping accuracy of 99.9999%). For the NPS samples, the average genomic coverage was 89.35% on the QNome nanopore platform compared with 90.39% for MGI. In addition, fewer consensus genomes from QNome were determined to be good by Nextclade compare with MGI (p < 0.05). A total of 9004 mutations were identified using QNome sequencing, with substitutions being the most prevalent, in contrast, 10 997 mutations were detected on MGI (p < 0.05). Furthermore, 23 large deletions (i.e., deletions≥ 10 bp) were identified by QNome while 19/23 were supported by evidence from short-read sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the Pango lineage of consensus genomes for SARS-CoV-2 sequenced by QNome concorded 83.04% with MGI. QNome nanopore sequencing, though challenged by read quality and accuracy compared to MGI, is overcoming these issues through bioinformatics and computational advances. The advantage of structure variation (SV) detection capabilities and real-time data analysis renders it a promising alternative nanopore platform for the surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2.

Journal of Medical VirologyVol. 96(12)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Fujian Petrochemical Group (China) (CN)
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.