P-32 ACCESSIBILITY TO SEQUENTIAL SYSTEMIC TREATMENT AFTER TACE: IMPACT ON SURVIVAL IN A LATIN AMERICAN PROSPECTIVE COHORT

No Stopping rules following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), either tumor progression or “unTACEable” progression are needed. Avoiding liver decompensation after TACE may lead better access to systemic treatment and survival. These scenarios are unknown in our region. We aimed to evaluate accessibility to systemic therapy following TACE and its impact on survival. A multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in Latin America, included HCC patients receiving TACE from May 15, 2018 to March 15, 2024. We excluded patients on the liver transplant waiting list, or Child Pugh C. Survival since first TACE was compared between groups accessing (A) and not accessing (no-A) to systemic therapy after TACE through Cox proportional hazard survival analysis, and adjusted treatment effect was further evaluated using a propensity score (PS) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). rom 258 receiving TACE, 188 were included after excluding 33 patients on the waiting list and 37 Child C (Table). Access to any systemic therapy was 46.8% (95% CI 39.5-54.2%), within a median time from TACE to first line of 9 months (range 3.7-17.0). In group A (n=88) systemic treatments following TACE were sorafenib 62.5%, atezolizumab + bevacizumab 31.8%, and lenvatinib 4.5%. Paradoxically, while presenting better liver function reserve, liver decompensation after TACE was more frequent in group A (7% vs 0%; P=0.004), without significant differences regarding median number of TACEs, modality, or tumor burden. Median survival since first TACE between groups was A 37.4 months vs no-A 29.8 months [HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.44-1.10), adjusted for the HAP score (Figure), which was unchanged after PS and IPTW. In our region, less than half of HCC systemic treatment candidates acceded to sequential TACE-systemic therapy. Although not statistically significant, due to underpowered estimations, numerically higher survival was achieved with TACE-systemic therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Hepatology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101646
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-32 ACCESSIBILITY TO SEQUENTIAL SYSTEMIC TREATMENT AFTER TACE: IMPACT ON SURVIVAL IN A LATIN AMERICAN PROSPECTIVE COHORT

Adriana Varón, Nicolás Medina, Federico Orozco Ganem, Diego Arufe et al.
Annals of Hepatology
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

P-32 ACCESSIBILITY TO SEQUENTIAL SYSTEMIC TREATMENT AFTER TACE: IMPACT ON SURVIVAL IN A LATIN AMERICAN PROSPECTIVE COHORT

Adriana Varón, Nicolás Medina, Federico Orozco Ganem, Diego Arufe, Jaime Poníachik, Juan Ignacio Marín, Hugo Cheinquer, Leonardo Gomes da Fonseca, Manuel Mendizábal, Estela Manero, Federico Piñero, Ezequiel Ridruejo, Jorge Centeno, Virginia Reggiardo, Sebastián Marciano, Margarita Anders, Patricio Palavecino Rubilar, Norberto Tamagnone, Carla Bermúdez, Oscar Beltrán, Ana Palazzo
article en

Abstract

No Stopping rules following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), either tumor progression or “unTACEable” progression are needed. Avoiding liver decompensation after TACE may lead better access to systemic treatment and survival. These scenarios are unknown in our region. We aimed to evaluate accessibility to systemic therapy following TACE and its impact on survival. A multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in Latin America, included HCC patients receiving TACE from May 15, 2018 to March 15, 2024. We excluded patients on the liver transplant waiting list, or Child Pugh C. Survival since first TACE was compared between groups accessing (A) and not accessing (no-A) to systemic therapy after TACE through Cox proportional hazard survival analysis, and adjusted treatment effect was further evaluated using a propensity score (PS) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). rom 258 receiving TACE, 188 were included after excluding 33 patients on the waiting list and 37 Child C (Table). Access to any systemic therapy was 46.8% (95% CI 39.5-54.2%), within a median time from TACE to first line of 9 months (range 3.7-17.0). In group A (n=88) systemic treatments following TACE were sorafenib 62.5%, atezolizumab + bevacizumab 31.8%, and lenvatinib 4.5%. Paradoxically, while presenting better liver function reserve, liver decompensation after TACE was more frequent in group A (7% vs 0%; P=0.004), without significant differences regarding median number of TACEs, modality, or tumor burden. Median survival since first TACE between groups was A 37.4 months vs no-A 29.8 months [HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.44-1.10), adjusted for the HAP score (Figure), which was unchanged after PS and IPTW. In our region, less than half of HCC systemic treatment candidates acceded to sequential TACE-systemic therapy. Although not statistically significant, due to underpowered estimations, numerically higher survival was achieved with TACE-systemic therapies.

Annals of HepatologyVol. 29
University of Mendoza (AR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), National University of Jujuy (AR), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (BR), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR), Hospital Universitario Austral (AR), Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe (CO), Hospital Provincial de Rosario (AR), Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile (CL), Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (CO), Institute of Cardiology (CO), Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno (AR), Hospital Alemán (AR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.