Resilience Indicators for Tropical Rainforests in a Dynamic Vegetation Model

Tropical forests and particularly the Amazon rainforest have been identified as potential tipping elements in the Earth system. According to a dynamical systems theory, a decline in forest resilience preceding a potential shift to a savanna-like biome could manifest as increasing autocorrelation of biomass time series. Recent satellite records indeed exhibit such a trend and also show larger autocorrelation, indicative of reduced resilience, in drier forest regions. However, it is unclear which processes underlie these observational findings and on which scales they operate. Here, we investigate which processes determine tropical forest resilience in the stand-alone, state-of-the-art dynamic global vegetation model LPJmL. We find that autocorrelation is higher in dry climates than wet climates (approx. 0.75 vs. 0.2, for a lag of 10 years), which qualitatively agrees with observations. By constructing a reduced version of LPJmL and by disabling and enabling certain processes in the model, we show that (i) this pattern is associated with population dynamics operating on different time scales in different climates and (ii) that the pattern is sensitive to the allocation of carbon to different pools, especially in years of stress. Both processes are highly uncertain, oversimplified or even lacking in most Earth system models. Our results indicate that the observed spatial variations and trends in vegetation resilience indicators may be explained by local physiological and ecological mechanisms alone, without climate-vegetation feedbacks. In principle, this is consistent with the view that the Amazon rainforest is responding to climate change locally and does not necessarily need to approach one large-scale tipping point, although the latter cannot be ruled out based on our findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Change Biology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17613
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilience Indicators for Tropical Rainforests in a Dynamic Vegetation Model

Niklas Boers, Markus Drüke, Sebastian Bathiany, Da Nian
3 citations
Global Change Biology
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
0.85
article

Resilience Indicators for Tropical Rainforests in a Dynamic Vegetation Model

Niklas Boers, Markus Drüke, Sebastian Bathiany, Da Nian
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Tropical forests and particularly the Amazon rainforest have been identified as potential tipping elements in the Earth system. According to a dynamical systems theory, a decline in forest resilience preceding a potential shift to a savanna-like biome could manifest as increasing autocorrelation of biomass time series. Recent satellite records indeed exhibit such a trend and also show larger autocorrelation, indicative of reduced resilience, in drier forest regions. However, it is unclear which processes underlie these observational findings and on which scales they operate. Here, we investigate which processes determine tropical forest resilience in the stand-alone, state-of-the-art dynamic global vegetation model LPJmL. We find that autocorrelation is higher in dry climates than wet climates (approx. 0.75 vs. 0.2, for a lag of 10 years), which qualitatively agrees with observations. By constructing a reduced version of LPJmL and by disabling and enabling certain processes in the model, we show that (i) this pattern is associated with population dynamics operating on different time scales in different climates and (ii) that the pattern is sensitive to the allocation of carbon to different pools, especially in years of stress. Both processes are highly uncertain, oversimplified or even lacking in most Earth system models. Our results indicate that the observed spatial variations and trends in vegetation resilience indicators may be explained by local physiological and ecological mechanisms alone, without climate-vegetation feedbacks. In principle, this is consistent with the view that the Amazon rainforest is responding to climate change locally and does not necessarily need to approach one large-scale tipping point, although the latter cannot be ruled out based on our findings.

Global Change BiologyVol. 30(12)
Deutscher Wetterdienst (DE), Norsk Hydro (Germany) (DE), University of Exeter (GB), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Deutsche Bahn, European Commission, Volkswagen Foundation, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.