Comparing Average and Peak Physical Demands and Well-Being Status During Basketball Back-to-Back Games

This study investigated the impact of consecutive basketball games on the physical demands and well-being of young players under 18 years old (U-18), focusing on the peak demands (PD). Monitoring 17 players over 10 games (5 weekends), external load expressed as relative distance (RD) (m·min−1), high-speed running distance covered (HSR) (m·min−1), maximal accelerations (ACC) (n·min−1), and maximal decelerations (DEC) (n·min−1) normalized by playing time were assessed, and the Hooper index was used to evaluate wellness status. Additionally, linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models were employed to detect differences, revealing a significant decrease in RD·min−1 (F = 4.71, p = 0.04) during the second back-to-back game. ACC·min−1 also exhibited significant differences (χ2 = 6.44, p = 0.01) between players in one or two games. However, the PD remained unchanged. Conversely, the Hooper index significantly improved between games (2.67 arb. u. [95% CI 0.11–5.24]; p = 0.04, d = 1.25 large), indicating enhanced well-being on the second competition day. Although RD·min−1 differences suggest the onset of residual fatigue, U-18 teams seem to adapt correctly to a two-game schedule through player auto-regulatory pacing and squad rotation. The positive change in wellness on the second day suggests a need for a comprehensive approach to assessing basketball performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311374
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Average and Peak Physical Demands and Well-Being Status During Basketball Back-to-Back Games

Jordi Vicens‐Bordas, Julio Calleja-González, Javier Peña, Javier Espasa-Labrador et al.
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
0.96
article

Comparing Average and Peak Physical Demands and Well-Being Status During Basketball Back-to-Back Games

Jordi Vicens‐Bordas, Julio Calleja-González, Javier Peña, Javier Espasa-Labrador, Franc García
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of consecutive basketball games on the physical demands and well-being of young players under 18 years old (U-18), focusing on the peak demands (PD). Monitoring 17 players over 10 games (5 weekends), external load expressed as relative distance (RD) (m·min−1), high-speed running distance covered (HSR) (m·min−1), maximal accelerations (ACC) (n·min−1), and maximal decelerations (DEC) (n·min−1) normalized by playing time were assessed, and the Hooper index was used to evaluate wellness status. Additionally, linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models were employed to detect differences, revealing a significant decrease in RD·min−1 (F = 4.71, p = 0.04) during the second back-to-back game. ACC·min−1 also exhibited significant differences (χ2 = 6.44, p = 0.01) between players in one or two games. However, the PD remained unchanged. Conversely, the Hooper index significantly improved between games (2.67 arb. u. [95% CI 0.11–5.24]; p = 0.04, d = 1.25 large), indicating enhanced well-being on the second competition day. Although RD·min−1 differences suggest the onset of residual fatigue, U-18 teams seem to adapt correctly to a two-game schedule through player auto-regulatory pacing and squad rotation. The positive change in wellness on the second day suggests a need for a comprehensive approach to assessing basketball performance.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(23)
Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya (ES), University of the Basque Country (ES), University of Zagreb (HR), Italian Society of Physiotherapy (IT), FC Barcelona (ES), Institut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Sports Performance and Training
0.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.