Clinical Outcomes of Shifting from Transfemoral-First to Transradial-First Approach in Carotid Artery Stenting: A Retrospective Two-Timeframe Comparison at a Single Center

<b>Objective:</b> Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has traditionally been performed using the transfemoral approach (TFA). Recently, the transradial approach (TRA) has gained attention for its lower invasiveness and reduced complication risk. This study compares outcomes between two access strategy timeframes, TFA-first and TRA-first, to evaluate how this shift influences outcomes in a real-world setting. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of 85 CAS procedures was conducted at our institution from October 2018 to September 2024, categorizing them into TFA-first (n = 42) and TRA-first (n = 43) periods. The primary endpoint was access-related complications and 30-day perioperative events, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality. The secondary endpoints included target lesion access success rate, frequency of access route conversions, procedural time, and hospital length of stay. <b>Results:</b> Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, symptomatic status, stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, and anatomical considerations, were comparable between groups. In the TFA-first period, 88% of procedures utilized TFA, and TRA was not used at all, while the remaining 12% employed the transbrachial approach (TBA). In the TRA-first period, 23% of procedures employed TFA, 60% utilized TRA, and 16% relied on TBA (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Both groups achieved a similar rate of target lesion access success (98% each) with only one conversion per group. The primary endpoint was significantly lower in the TRA-first group (0%) compared to the TFA-first group (10%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), primarily due to reduced access-site complications. Additionally, the median hospital stay was shorter in the TRA-first group at 6 days compared to 10 days (<i>p</i> = 0.02). <b>Conclusions:</b> Adopting a TRA-first strategy over TFA in CAS leads to better outcomes by improving access-site safety and reducing hospital stays. Developing TRA-specific devices could further expand the applicability of TRA in CAS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237432
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Vascular Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of Shifting from Transfemoral-First to Transradial-First Approach in Carotid Artery Stenting: A Retrospective Two-Timeframe Comparison at a Single Center

Takashi Sasayama, Ichiro Maeda, Junichi Sakata, Hirotoshi Hamaguchi et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Vascular Procedures and Complications
1.68
article

Clinical Outcomes of Shifting from Transfemoral-First to Transradial-First Approach in Carotid Artery Stenting: A Retrospective Two-Timeframe Comparison at a Single Center

Takashi Sasayama, Ichiro Maeda, Junichi Sakata, Hirotoshi Hamaguchi, Daisuke Yamamoto, Nobuyuki Sakai, Taichiro Imahori, Kohkichi Hosoda, Shigeru Miyake, Rikuo Nishii, Hiroki Goto, Haruka Enami, Jun Tanaka, Tomoaki Harada
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has traditionally been performed using the transfemoral approach (TFA). Recently, the transradial approach (TRA) has gained attention for its lower invasiveness and reduced complication risk. This study compares outcomes between two access strategy timeframes, TFA-first and TRA-first, to evaluate how this shift influences outcomes in a real-world setting. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of 85 CAS procedures was conducted at our institution from October 2018 to September 2024, categorizing them into TFA-first (n = 42) and TRA-first (n = 43) periods. The primary endpoint was access-related complications and 30-day perioperative events, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality. The secondary endpoints included target lesion access success rate, frequency of access route conversions, procedural time, and hospital length of stay. <b>Results:</b> Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, symptomatic status, stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, and anatomical considerations, were comparable between groups. In the TFA-first period, 88% of procedures utilized TFA, and TRA was not used at all, while the remaining 12% employed the transbrachial approach (TBA). In the TRA-first period, 23% of procedures employed TFA, 60% utilized TRA, and 16% relied on TBA (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Both groups achieved a similar rate of target lesion access success (98% each) with only one conversion per group. The primary endpoint was significantly lower in the TRA-first group (0%) compared to the TFA-first group (10%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), primarily due to reduced access-site complications. Additionally, the median hospital stay was shorter in the TRA-first group at 6 days compared to 10 days (<i>p</i> = 0.02). <b>Conclusions:</b> Adopting a TRA-first strategy over TFA in CAS leads to better outcomes by improving access-site safety and reducing hospital stays. Developing TRA-specific devices could further expand the applicability of TRA in CAS.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(23)
Shizuoka City Shimizu Hospital (JP), Tokyo-Kita Medical Center (JP), Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital (JP), Kobe University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Vascular Procedures and Complications
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.