“I am happy to take the lead”. A ventriloquial perspective on leadership and authority: What authorises organisational players to take the lead?

Authority has long been associated with leadership, but the relationship between authority and leadership has remained elusive. Addressing the issue of the interplay between authority and leadership, this paper builds on limited recent work that has considered leadership to be an in situ accomplishment in which the doing of authority is interwoven with the doing of leadership. Using transcripts of real-time interaction taken from a Board meeting of an NGO, and applying the Montreal School’s ventriloquial approach to the analysis of organisational communication, the research question this paper asks is: what authorises one of the Board members to ‘take the lead’ in establishing measures to ensure that the actions of the NGO are sustainable? Findings suggest that it is neither position, nor expertise, that authorise leadership. Rather, it is the articulation of the ideal of sustainability. Leadership is thus shown to be both a question of human leaders and ideals that they are able to mobilise which authorise their claim to leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leadership
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150241303794
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I am happy to take the lead”. A ventriloquial perspective on leadership and authority: What authorises organisational players to take the lead?

Jonathan Clifton
Leadership
Management and Organizational Studies
article

“I am happy to take the lead”. A ventriloquial perspective on leadership and authority: What authorises organisational players to take the lead?

Jonathan Clifton
article en

Abstract

Authority has long been associated with leadership, but the relationship between authority and leadership has remained elusive. Addressing the issue of the interplay between authority and leadership, this paper builds on limited recent work that has considered leadership to be an in situ accomplishment in which the doing of authority is interwoven with the doing of leadership. Using transcripts of real-time interaction taken from a Board meeting of an NGO, and applying the Montreal School’s ventriloquial approach to the analysis of organisational communication, the research question this paper asks is: what authorises one of the Board members to ‘take the lead’ in establishing measures to ensure that the actions of the NGO are sustainable? Findings suggest that it is neither position, nor expertise, that authorise leadership. Rather, it is the articulation of the ideal of sustainability. Leadership is thus shown to be both a question of human leaders and ideals that they are able to mobilise which authorise their claim to leadership.

LeadershipVol. 21(1)
Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France (FR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“I am happy to take the lead”. A ventriloquial perspective on leadership and authority: What authorises organisational players to take the lead? — Jonathan Clifton · Leadership (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS