How stable are taste-shape crossmodal correspondences over time?

The present research investigates the stability of taste-shape crossmodal correspondences (i.e., how people non-randomly associate tastes and visual shapes, such as sweetness matched to roundness) over time, exploring the temporal dimension of crossmodal interactions. While previous research has established the existence of various taste-shape crossmodal correspondences, this study addresses their consistency over time through a test-retest paradigm. Drawing parallels with the concept of synesthesia, in which stability is used as a criterion, the research focuses on taste-shape associations, a domain not previously explored for temporal stability. Participants rated the perceived curvature and symmetry that they associated with taste words (sweet, umami, sour, salty, and bitter) and their liking of tastes and shapes. The same participants performed this task three times over a 2-week period. The results consistently replicated previous findings, revealing that sweet tastes were perceived as significantly more curved and symmetrical than other tastes, and umami was rated as more curved and symmetrical than sour, salty, and bitter tastes. Notably, the study found moderate-to-substantial test-retest reliability for the majority of the taste-shape correspondences, indicating robust stability over time. Analyses suggested that differences in assessments between test and retest sessions were primarily due to random error, with no systematic biases. However, a small subset of participants showed significant differences from other participants in their associations, particularly for umami-related correspondences. This research contributes to our understanding of taste-shape correspondences by demonstrating their temporal stability, offering insights into the dynamics of taste, curvature, symmetry, and liking. We posit that consistency might be used as a criterion supporting the existence of a given crossmodal correspondence. The findings have implications for product design and marketing, emphasising the importance of considering temporal aspects when capitalising on crossmodal correspondences in creating product expectations and experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241307929
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How stable are taste-shape crossmodal correspondences over time?

Charles J. Spence, Enric Munar, Erick G. Chuquichambi, Carlos Velasco et al.
2 citations
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Multisensory perception and integration
1.02
article

How stable are taste-shape crossmodal correspondences over time?

Charles J. Spence, Enric Munar, Erick G. Chuquichambi, Carlos Velasco, Farhana Tabassum
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The present research investigates the stability of taste-shape crossmodal correspondences (i.e., how people non-randomly associate tastes and visual shapes, such as sweetness matched to roundness) over time, exploring the temporal dimension of crossmodal interactions. While previous research has established the existence of various taste-shape crossmodal correspondences, this study addresses their consistency over time through a test-retest paradigm. Drawing parallels with the concept of synesthesia, in which stability is used as a criterion, the research focuses on taste-shape associations, a domain not previously explored for temporal stability. Participants rated the perceived curvature and symmetry that they associated with taste words (sweet, umami, sour, salty, and bitter) and their liking of tastes and shapes. The same participants performed this task three times over a 2-week period. The results consistently replicated previous findings, revealing that sweet tastes were perceived as significantly more curved and symmetrical than other tastes, and umami was rated as more curved and symmetrical than sour, salty, and bitter tastes. Notably, the study found moderate-to-substantial test-retest reliability for the majority of the taste-shape correspondences, indicating robust stability over time. Analyses suggested that differences in assessments between test and retest sessions were primarily due to random error, with no systematic biases. However, a small subset of participants showed significant differences from other participants in their associations, particularly for umami-related correspondences. This research contributes to our understanding of taste-shape correspondences by demonstrating their temporal stability, offering insights into the dynamics of taste, curvature, symmetry, and liking. We posit that consistency might be used as a criterion supporting the existence of a given crossmodal correspondence. The findings have implications for product design and marketing, emphasising the importance of considering temporal aspects when capitalising on crossmodal correspondences in creating product expectations and experiences.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 78(9)
BI Norwegian Business School (NO), University of Oxford (GB), Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion (FR), Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Multisensory perception and integration
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.