A Differentiable Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approach to Model Laser-Based Micro-Manufacturing Process

Abstract Advanced manufacturing processes are often based on complex multiphysics phenomena that are either poorly understood or are computationally too expensive to simulate in the context of process design, control, or planning. Traditionally, simplified physics models with prescribed heuristics or purely data-driven surrogate models are used as alternatives in such applications. The concept of physics-informed machine learning (PIML) has been shown to have unique advantages over both of these alternatives in various fields of complex system analysis. In this paper, a new PIML approach is presented to model the geometry of the cut produced by a magnetically assisted laser-induced plasma micro-machining (M-LIPMM) process. This PIML architecture uses a neural network to auto-adapt the parametric boundary condition and physical properties used in a simplified finite difference-based physics model (of 2D heat conduction), as a function of the inputs namely the laser settings. This network also estimates the scaling and shifting parameters used by a convolutional neural network that takes the temperature profile predicted by the simplified heat conduction model to predict the width and depth of the machined cut. Trained on physical experiment data, the PIML approach compares favorably to a pure data-driven neural network model in extrapolation tests, while also providing physical insights (that the latter cannot). The PIML approach also provides an 85% better accuracy overall compared to the simplified physics model with heuristic settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067355
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Differentiable Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approach to Model Laser-Based Micro-Manufacturing Process

Rajiv Malhotra, Jeremy Cleeman, Manaswin Oddiraju, Souma Chowdhury
10 citations
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.13
article

A Differentiable Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approach to Model Laser-Based Micro-Manufacturing Process

Rajiv Malhotra, Jeremy Cleeman, Manaswin Oddiraju, Souma Chowdhury
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract Advanced manufacturing processes are often based on complex multiphysics phenomena that are either poorly understood or are computationally too expensive to simulate in the context of process design, control, or planning. Traditionally, simplified physics models with prescribed heuristics or purely data-driven surrogate models are used as alternatives in such applications. The concept of physics-informed machine learning (PIML) has been shown to have unique advantages over both of these alternatives in various fields of complex system analysis. In this paper, a new PIML approach is presented to model the geometry of the cut produced by a magnetically assisted laser-induced plasma micro-machining (M-LIPMM) process. This PIML architecture uses a neural network to auto-adapt the parametric boundary condition and physical properties used in a simplified finite difference-based physics model (of 2D heat conduction), as a function of the inputs namely the laser settings. This network also estimates the scaling and shifting parameters used by a convolutional neural network that takes the temperature profile predicted by the simplified heat conduction model to predict the width and depth of the machined cut. Trained on physical experiment data, the PIML approach compares favorably to a pure data-driven neural network model in extrapolation tests, while also providing physical insights (that the latter cannot). The PIML approach also provides an 85% better accuracy overall compared to the simplified physics model with heuristic settings.

Journal of Manufacturing Science and EngineeringVol. 147(5)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.