A Direct Measurement Method for the Uniaxial Tensile Strength of Rock

A universally applicable direct tension test method is proposed in this paper based on the concept of “compression-to-tension”. Using this method, one or two typical rocks were selected for each of the three types of rocks. The testing results of the direct tension method proposed were compared with the internationally recommended Brazilian splitting method to validate the feasibility of the direct tension method. Results showed that the tensile strengths of six typical rocks were consistent using the direct tensile test method proposed in this study and the Brazilian splitting method recommended internationally. The direct tensile strength deviation coefficient (Cv) of the six types of rocks was less than 0.1, indicating very small variability. In this study, the deviation coefficient (Cv) of the axial displacement corresponding to the tensile strength in both the direct tensile and indirect tensile tests was also less than 0.1, reflecting minimal variability. This shows the consistency of the two tensile test results to a certain extent, and also shows that the direct tensile test method is feasible to determine the tensile strength of rock.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123903
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Direct Measurement Method for the Uniaxial Tensile Strength of Rock

Mingming He, Yinuo Zhang, Zhipeng Hong, Zhixun Wen et al.
3 citations
Buildings
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.81
article

A Direct Measurement Method for the Uniaxial Tensile Strength of Rock

Mingming He, Yinuo Zhang, Zhipeng Hong, Zhixun Wen, Mingchen Ding, Xiaoyue Yu, Liang He
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A universally applicable direct tension test method is proposed in this paper based on the concept of “compression-to-tension”. Using this method, one or two typical rocks were selected for each of the three types of rocks. The testing results of the direct tension method proposed were compared with the internationally recommended Brazilian splitting method to validate the feasibility of the direct tension method. Results showed that the tensile strengths of six typical rocks were consistent using the direct tensile test method proposed in this study and the Brazilian splitting method recommended internationally. The direct tensile strength deviation coefficient (Cv) of the six types of rocks was less than 0.1, indicating very small variability. In this study, the deviation coefficient (Cv) of the axial displacement corresponding to the tensile strength in both the direct tensile and indirect tensile tests was also less than 0.1, reflecting minimal variability. This shows the consistency of the two tensile test results to a certain extent, and also shows that the direct tensile test method is feasible to determine the tensile strength of rock.

BuildingsVol. 14(12)
Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, Education Department of Shaanxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.