An Evaluation of London's Intermediate Minor Oral Surgery Service

ABSTRACT Background Oral surgery as a speciality has traditionally experienced significant demands, representing one of the largest volume and cost of referrals from primary to secondary care. The IMOS service was created with the objective to increase the efficiency and accessibility of oral surgery services to the public, as well as reduce pressures within hospital settings. Aims To assess: The quality of the service provided. The waiting times. If the service met needs. Patient‐reported outcome and experience measures. Method A random sample of patients referred to London Tier 2 IMOS providers were selected, 10 from each provider, totalling 180. They were evaluated to ascertain waiting times, treatment delivered, quality of documentation and level of complexity, level 1, 2, and 3. Patient‐Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were also carried out to assess satisfaction. Results 38.3% of referrals were classed as Level 1 and the remaining Level 2 and Level 3 were 60% and 1.67%, respectively. 37.2% of patients were seen within 0–49 days, and 72.3% of patients were seen and treated within 18 weeks. 90.8% of these cases were non‐surgical, 17.9% involved mandibular 3rd molar extractions, of which 46.6% were surgical. 313 PREMs and 321 PROMs were collected, the experience survey revealed over 98.7% of patients felt anxiety and pain were managed well, with any concerns addressed. PROMs showed that 94.3% of patients did not require further calls or assistance post‐treatment. 72.4% of patients felt recovery was completed within 3 days of the treatment. 1.87% of patients required further assistance such as for dry socket and infection. Conclusion The London IMOS service is an economical, safe and effective environment to provide minor oral surgery to the vast majority of patients, who would have otherwise been seen in secondary care. Development of pan London triage and communication pathways will further enhance the service and ensure smooth and efficient patient journeys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral Surgery
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12938
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Education, Practice, Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evaluation of London's Intermediate Minor Oral Surgery Service

Adesh Savla, Rashi Gupta, Sonita Koshal
2 citations
Oral Surgery
Dental Education, Practice, Research
1.70
article

An Evaluation of London's Intermediate Minor Oral Surgery Service

Adesh Savla, Rashi Gupta, Sonita Koshal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Oral surgery as a speciality has traditionally experienced significant demands, representing one of the largest volume and cost of referrals from primary to secondary care. The IMOS service was created with the objective to increase the efficiency and accessibility of oral surgery services to the public, as well as reduce pressures within hospital settings. Aims To assess: The quality of the service provided. The waiting times. If the service met needs. Patient‐reported outcome and experience measures. Method A random sample of patients referred to London Tier 2 IMOS providers were selected, 10 from each provider, totalling 180. They were evaluated to ascertain waiting times, treatment delivered, quality of documentation and level of complexity, level 1, 2, and 3. Patient‐Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were also carried out to assess satisfaction. Results 38.3% of referrals were classed as Level 1 and the remaining Level 2 and Level 3 were 60% and 1.67%, respectively. 37.2% of patients were seen within 0–49 days, and 72.3% of patients were seen and treated within 18 weeks. 90.8% of these cases were non‐surgical, 17.9% involved mandibular 3rd molar extractions, of which 46.6% were surgical. 313 PREMs and 321 PROMs were collected, the experience survey revealed over 98.7% of patients felt anxiety and pain were managed well, with any concerns addressed. PROMs showed that 94.3% of patients did not require further calls or assistance post‐treatment. 72.4% of patients felt recovery was completed within 3 days of the treatment. 1.87% of patients required further assistance such as for dry socket and infection. Conclusion The London IMOS service is an economical, safe and effective environment to provide minor oral surgery to the vast majority of patients, who would have otherwise been seen in secondary care. Development of pan London triage and communication pathways will further enhance the service and ensure smooth and efficient patient journeys.

Oral SurgeryVol. 18(2)
Eastman Dental Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Dental Education, Practice, Research
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.