Design-based methods for exploring ethical questions in the field of neurotechnologies

Numerous complex and multi-faceted ethical questions arise from the innovation of neurotechnologies. Addressing these issues effectively requires the involvement of a diverse range of stakeholders, including patients, treatment providers, home users, scientists and engineers from different disciplines, and industry representatives. Different groups, however, possess varying levels of knowledge and experience regarding the ethical use and innovation of neurotechnologies. Therefore, customized methods are needed to identify their perspectives and ethical concerns. This article aims to introduce practical methods for eliciting ethical questions in the field of neurotechnology, including user journeys, persona approaches, material thinking, scenario building, fictional media contributions, and categorization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2408814
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design-based methods for exploring ethical questions in the field of neurotechnologies

Adrian Carter, Andrea Antal, Moritz Julian Maier, Perianen Ramasawmy et al.
2 citations
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
0.69
article

Design-based methods for exploring ethical questions in the field of neurotechnologies

Adrian Carter, Andrea Antal, Moritz Julian Maier, Perianen Ramasawmy, Georg Northoff, Antonio Oliviero, Johannes Breuer, Anne Bansen, Marie-Lena Heidingsfelder
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Numerous complex and multi-faceted ethical questions arise from the innovation of neurotechnologies. Addressing these issues effectively requires the involvement of a diverse range of stakeholders, including patients, treatment providers, home users, scientists and engineers from different disciplines, and industry representatives. Different groups, however, possess varying levels of knowledge and experience regarding the ethical use and innovation of neurotechnologies. Therefore, customized methods are needed to identify their perspectives and ethical concerns. This article aims to introduce practical methods for eliciting ethical questions in the field of neurotechnology, including user journeys, persona approaches, material thinking, scenario building, fictional media contributions, and categorization.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 11(1)
University of Ottawa (CA), Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre (CA), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering (DE), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Servicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha (ES), Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (ES), Monash University (AU), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.