‘Psychoanalysis for the Many’: Melitta Schmideberg's Work with Offenders in Psychoanalytic Free Clinics

In current histories of psychoanalysis, Melitta Schmideberg still lives under the shadow of her mother, Melanie Klein. If Schmideberg’s name is mentioned at all, it is in the context of the so-called Controversial Discussions that took place at the British Psychoanalytical Society in the early 1940s, in which Schmideberg directly questioned Klein’s views. In terms of psychoanalytic contributions, Schmideberg’s decades-long work with juvenile and adult offenders is barely mentioned. This article attempts to correct this imbalance by looking at Schmideberg’s innovations in offender therapy. Schmideberg understood that the available methods of psychoanalytic therapy (whether Freudian or Kleinian) would not suit patients she engaged with (antisocial, borderline and psychotic patients) and developed her own methodology of working with these groups. The article explores Schmideberg’s methods, while focusing specifically on the flexibility of the time, money and spatial frame, the role of reassurance, questions of transference as well as what she called ‘group therapy in reverse’. It also presents her virtually unknown work at the Association for the Psychiatric Treatment of Offenders, an institution she founded in the USA, and her thoughts on the role of class in the care system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychoanalysis and History
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/pah.2024.0524
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Psychoanalysis for the Many’: Melitta Schmideberg's Work with Offenders in Psychoanalytic Free Clinics

Ana Tomčić
1 citations
Psychoanalysis and History
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
0.64
article

‘Psychoanalysis for the Many’: Melitta Schmideberg's Work with Offenders in Psychoanalytic Free Clinics

Ana Tomčić
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In current histories of psychoanalysis, Melitta Schmideberg still lives under the shadow of her mother, Melanie Klein. If Schmideberg’s name is mentioned at all, it is in the context of the so-called Controversial Discussions that took place at the British Psychoanalytical Society in the early 1940s, in which Schmideberg directly questioned Klein’s views. In terms of psychoanalytic contributions, Schmideberg’s decades-long work with juvenile and adult offenders is barely mentioned. This article attempts to correct this imbalance by looking at Schmideberg’s innovations in offender therapy. Schmideberg understood that the available methods of psychoanalytic therapy (whether Freudian or Kleinian) would not suit patients she engaged with (antisocial, borderline and psychotic patients) and developed her own methodology of working with these groups. The article explores Schmideberg’s methods, while focusing specifically on the flexibility of the time, money and spatial frame, the role of reassurance, questions of transference as well as what she called ‘group therapy in reverse’. It also presents her virtually unknown work at the Association for the Psychiatric Treatment of Offenders, an institution she founded in the USA, and her thoughts on the role of class in the care system.

Psychoanalysis and HistoryVol. 26(3)
Prudhoe Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.