Do People Believe They Are Less Predictable Than Others? Three Replications of Pronin and Kugler’s (2010) Experiment 1

Pronin and Kugler (2010) proposed that people believe they have more free will than others. In their Experiment 1 they showed that US students evaluated their own decisions and life events as less predictable than similar decisions and life events of close others, presumably suggesting higher free will attributions. We conducted three pre-registered replications of this study, one with a Hong Kong undergraduate sample (<i>N</i> = 47) and two online samples from the USA (MTurk using CloudResearch: <i>N</i> = 126, Prolific: <i>N</i> = 858) (overall <i>N</i> = 1031). In Studies 1a and 1b that mirrored the target article's mixed design (self-other between, past-future within), we found support for the original findings with weaker effects. In Study 2 we contrasted between-subject versus within-subject designs in a single data collection. We successfully replicated the effects with the between-subject design, whereas we failed to find support for the effect using the within-subjects design. This suggests support for the phenomenon in single evaluation mode assessing either the self or the other, but that people correct for the self-other asymmetry in perceived predictability when the judgment is made in joint evaluations mode. Materials, data, and code are available on: https://osf.io/ykmqp/. Open peer review: https://osf.io/d47kj.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International review of social psychology
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.946
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do People Believe They Are Less Predictable Than Others? Three Replications of Pronin and Kugler&rsquo;s (2010) Experiment 1

Hallgeir Sjåstad, Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Bo Ley Cheng, M.M. Wong et al.
International review of social psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Do People Believe They Are Less Predictable Than Others? Three Replications of Pronin and Kugler&rsquo;s (2010) Experiment 1

Hallgeir Sjåstad, Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Bo Ley Cheng, M.M. Wong, Gilad Feldman, K Wan, Stanley Wei Jian Hugh, Khan Tahira, Stephanie Permut, Chelsea Lo, Yong Jun Kueh, Emily Sihui Zhong, Kai Yi Kelly Choy
article en

Abstract

Pronin and Kugler (2010) proposed that people believe they have more free will than others. In their Experiment 1 they showed that US students evaluated their own decisions and life events as less predictable than similar decisions and life events of close others, presumably suggesting higher free will attributions. We conducted three pre-registered replications of this study, one with a Hong Kong undergraduate sample (<i>N</i> = 47) and two online samples from the USA (MTurk using CloudResearch: <i>N</i> = 126, Prolific: <i>N</i> = 858) (overall <i>N</i> = 1031). In Studies 1a and 1b that mirrored the target article's mixed design (self-other between, past-future within), we found support for the original findings with weaker effects. In Study 2 we contrasted between-subject versus within-subject designs in a single data collection. We successfully replicated the effects with the between-subject design, whereas we failed to find support for the effect using the within-subjects design. This suggests support for the phenomenon in single evaluation mode assessing either the self or the other, but that people correct for the self-other asymmetry in perceived predictability when the judgment is made in joint evaluations mode. Materials, data, and code are available on: https://osf.io/ykmqp/. Open peer review: https://osf.io/d47kj.

International review of social psychologyVol. 37(1)
Princeton University (US), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), University of Hong Kong (HK), Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.