The Critical Influence of Wire Diameter and Bending for Orthodontic Wire Integration—New Insights for Maxillary Movements (In Vitro Study)

<b>Background</b>: Traditional methods for palatal expansion using fixed appliances often face limitations in comfort and aesthetics. In comparison, aligner therapy has limitations, particularly regarding maxillary expansion. The aim of this study is to examine the biomechanical properties regarding the wire diameter and bending of different stainless steel wires to evaluate their potential for incorporation into maxillary aligner therapy. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: Three rectangular stainless steel wires (0.016″ × 0.022″, 0.017″ × 0.025″, and 0.019″ × 0.025″) were tested for mechanical expansion forces in the intermolar region, comparing non-tooth-shaped bent wires (A groups) and tooth-shaped bent wires (B groups). Using a Z010 testing machine (ZwickRoell GmbH and Co. KG, Ulm, Germany), expansion forces were measured at 1 mm intervals over a 5 mm distance, with 15 samples analyzed per group. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test for normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U test, which revealed significant results (U = 225, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the Kruskal-Wallis test, which indicated significance (H = 39.130; df = 2; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Results</b>: Tooth-shaped bent wires exhibited significantly lower expansion forces than non-tooth-shaped bent wires for all tested wire types. This difference was most notable in wires with larger transverse profiles (0.019″ × 0.025″), where the tooth-shaped bent wires displayed a marked reduction in mechanical load capacity. Specific force measurements for non-tooth-shaped wires ranged from 760.61 ± 79.51 mN at 1 mm of deformation to 2468.46 ± 66.27 mN at 5 mm of deformation, while tooth-shaped wires ranged from 116.80 ± 3.74 mN to 1979.49 ± 23.23 mN. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that non-tooth-shaped bent wires offer a more efficient and uniform expansion potential for maxillary movements due to their stable elastic properties. Clinically, integrating non-tooth-shaped stainless steel wires into aligner therapy may provide a viable method for maxillary expansion, supporting both first- and second-order movements in orthodontic treatment. Further research is needed to explore the integration of such wires for effective maxillary expansion in aligner therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12120399
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Critical Influence of Wire Diameter and Bending for Orthodontic Wire Integration—New Insights for Maxillary Movements (In Vitro Study)

Benedikt Schneider, Fady Fahim, Constantin von See, Ahmed Othman et al.
Dentistry Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

The Critical Influence of Wire Diameter and Bending for Orthodontic Wire Integration—New Insights for Maxillary Movements (In Vitro Study)

Benedikt Schneider, Fady Fahim, Constantin von See, Ahmed Othman, Michael Moncher
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Traditional methods for palatal expansion using fixed appliances often face limitations in comfort and aesthetics. In comparison, aligner therapy has limitations, particularly regarding maxillary expansion. The aim of this study is to examine the biomechanical properties regarding the wire diameter and bending of different stainless steel wires to evaluate their potential for incorporation into maxillary aligner therapy. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: Three rectangular stainless steel wires (0.016″ × 0.022″, 0.017″ × 0.025″, and 0.019″ × 0.025″) were tested for mechanical expansion forces in the intermolar region, comparing non-tooth-shaped bent wires (A groups) and tooth-shaped bent wires (B groups). Using a Z010 testing machine (ZwickRoell GmbH and Co. KG, Ulm, Germany), expansion forces were measured at 1 mm intervals over a 5 mm distance, with 15 samples analyzed per group. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test for normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U test, which revealed significant results (U = 225, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the Kruskal-Wallis test, which indicated significance (H = 39.130; df = 2; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Results</b>: Tooth-shaped bent wires exhibited significantly lower expansion forces than non-tooth-shaped bent wires for all tested wire types. This difference was most notable in wires with larger transverse profiles (0.019″ × 0.025″), where the tooth-shaped bent wires displayed a marked reduction in mechanical load capacity. Specific force measurements for non-tooth-shaped wires ranged from 760.61 ± 79.51 mN at 1 mm of deformation to 2468.46 ± 66.27 mN at 5 mm of deformation, while tooth-shaped wires ranged from 116.80 ± 3.74 mN to 1979.49 ± 23.23 mN. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that non-tooth-shaped bent wires offer a more efficient and uniform expansion potential for maxillary movements due to their stable elastic properties. Clinically, integrating non-tooth-shaped stainless steel wires into aligner therapy may provide a viable method for maxillary expansion, supporting both first- and second-order movements in orthodontic treatment. Further research is needed to explore the integration of such wires for effective maxillary expansion in aligner therapy.

Dentistry JournalVol. 12(12)
Danube Private University (AT), Cairo University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.