QCT/FEA analyses of palateless splinted and unsplinted maxillary all-on-4 systems

The goal of the presented study was to determine the viability of using splinted and unsplinted maxillary implant-supported overdentures. The main physical quantity used to evaluate their differences was compressive stress in bone and equivalent (von Mises) stress in the implant and overdenture components. We took a 3D X-ray scan of the maxilla and imported the data into a QCT/FEA (Quantitative Computed Tomography-based Finite Element Analysis) software. The loading was done in three load cases. We designed both models of the overdentures in CAD, included the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) overdenture and analyzed the whole model of the reconstructed maxilla with implants. The results show worse (more concentrated) compressive stress distributions for the unsplinted locator variant. The splinted, bar-retained variant shows lower values of stress in all load cases. These findings and their potential for real-time selection of the optimal variant are then further discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14311/app.2024.49.0071
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QCT/FEA analyses of palateless splinted and unsplinted maxillary all-on-4 systems

Luboš Řehounek, Aleš Jíra, Mária Frolo
Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

QCT/FEA analyses of palateless splinted and unsplinted maxillary all-on-4 systems

Luboš Řehounek, Aleš Jíra, Mária Frolo
article en

Abstract

The goal of the presented study was to determine the viability of using splinted and unsplinted maxillary implant-supported overdentures. The main physical quantity used to evaluate their differences was compressive stress in bone and equivalent (von Mises) stress in the implant and overdenture components. We took a 3D X-ray scan of the maxilla and imported the data into a QCT/FEA (Quantitative Computed Tomography-based Finite Element Analysis) software. The loading was done in three load cases. We designed both models of the overdentures in CAD, included the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) overdenture and analyzed the whole model of the reconstructed maxilla with implants. The results show worse (more concentrated) compressive stress distributions for the unsplinted locator variant. The splinted, bar-retained variant shows lower values of stress in all load cases. These findings and their potential for real-time selection of the optimal variant are then further discussed.

Acta Polytechnica CTU ProceedingsVol. 49
Charles University (CZ), Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.