A Machine Learning and Explainable AI Framework Tailored for Unbalanced Experimental Catalyst Discovery

The successful application of machine learning (ML) in catalyst design has been made difficult by the challenges associated with collecting high-quality and diverse data. Due to the complex interactions between catalyst components, the design of novel catalysts has long relied on trial-and-error, a costly and labor-intensive process that results in scarce data that is heavily biased toward undesired, low-yield catalysts. Such data presents a challenge for training ML models that generalize well to novel compositions, which is necessary for the success of ML-guided catalyst discovery. Despite the growing popularity of ML applications in this field, most efforts so far have not focused on dealing with the challenges presented by such experimental data. In this work, we introduce a robust ML and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework that incorporates a series of well-established ML methods designed to improve model performance and provide reliable evaluations for catalytic yield classification in the context of scarce and class-imbalanced data. We apply this framework to classify the yields of different catalyst combinations in the oxidative coupling of methane reaction and use it to evaluate the performance of a range of ML models: tree-based models (such as decision trees, random forest, and gradient boosted trees), logistic regression, support vector machines, and neural networks. Our experiments demonstrate that the methods used in our framework lead to more robust performance estimates and reduce the effect of class imbalance on model training, resulting in significant improvements in the predictive capability of all but one of the evaluated models. Additionally, the XAI component of the framework analyzes the decision-making process of each ML model by identifying the most important features for predicting catalyst performance. Our analysis found that XAI methods that provide class-aware explanations, such as Layer-wise Relevance Propagation, managed to identify key components that contribute specifically to high-yield catalysts. These findings align with chemical intuition and existing literature, reinforcing their validity. We believe this framework can serve as a blueprint and a set of best practices for ML applications in catalysis, driving future research while delivering robust models and actionable insights that can assist chemists in designing and discovering novel catalysts with superior performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c05332
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Machine Learning and Explainable AI Framework Tailored for Unbalanced Experimental Catalyst Discovery

Christoph Weisser, Thomas Kneib, Zizheng Zhang, Mihail Bogojeski et al.
13 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
4.52
article

A Machine Learning and Explainable AI Framework Tailored for Unbalanced Experimental Catalyst Discovery

Christoph Weisser, Thomas Kneib, Zizheng Zhang, Mihail Bogojeski, Klaus-Robert Müller, Florian Bley, Qiong Wu, Parastoo Semnani, Jan Herrmann, F. Patcas
article en
13 citations

Abstract

The successful application of machine learning (ML) in catalyst design has been made difficult by the challenges associated with collecting high-quality and diverse data. Due to the complex interactions between catalyst components, the design of novel catalysts has long relied on trial-and-error, a costly and labor-intensive process that results in scarce data that is heavily biased toward undesired, low-yield catalysts. Such data presents a challenge for training ML models that generalize well to novel compositions, which is necessary for the success of ML-guided catalyst discovery. Despite the growing popularity of ML applications in this field, most efforts so far have not focused on dealing with the challenges presented by such experimental data. In this work, we introduce a robust ML and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework that incorporates a series of well-established ML methods designed to improve model performance and provide reliable evaluations for catalytic yield classification in the context of scarce and class-imbalanced data. We apply this framework to classify the yields of different catalyst combinations in the oxidative coupling of methane reaction and use it to evaluate the performance of a range of ML models: tree-based models (such as decision trees, random forest, and gradient boosted trees), logistic regression, support vector machines, and neural networks. Our experiments demonstrate that the methods used in our framework lead to more robust performance estimates and reduce the effect of class imbalance on model training, resulting in significant improvements in the predictive capability of all but one of the evaluated models. Additionally, the XAI component of the framework analyzes the decision-making process of each ML model by identifying the most important features for predicting catalyst performance. Our analysis found that XAI methods that provide class-aware explanations, such as Layer-wise Relevance Propagation, managed to identify key components that contribute specifically to high-yield catalysts. These findings align with chemical intuition and existing literature, reinforcing their validity. We believe this framework can serve as a blueprint and a set of best practices for ML applications in catalysis, driving future research while delivering robust models and actionable insights that can assist chemists in designing and discovering novel catalysts with superior performance.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry CVol. 128(50)
Korea University (KR), Open Data Institute (GB), BASF (United States) (US), Federal Office for the Safety of Nuclear Waste Management (DE), BASF (Germany) (DE), Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE), Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
BASF, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Technische Universität Berlin, Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.