Comparison of <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT for Detection of Recurrent or Metastatic Paragangliomas

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of gallium 68 (<sup>68</sup>Ga)-DOTA-NaI3-octreotide (<sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC) and fluorine 18 (<sup>18</sup>F)-fluoro-l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (<sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA) PET/CT in detecting recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas. Materials and Methods This single-center retrospective study included patients with paragangliomas who underwent both <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT between August 2021 and December 2023. The diagnostic performance of these two tracers in detecting recurrent or metastatic tumors was compared using several metrics, including sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Results This study included 36 patients (median age, 52 years [range, 14-78 years]; 16 female, 20 male). Of these, nine underwent initial <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT examinations before treatment, and the remaining 27 underwent posttreatment examinations. Twenty-two of those 27 patients had recurrence or metastasis. According to lesion-level analysis, <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis of bone metastases than did <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT (97% vs 78% [<i>P</i> < .001], 85% vs 42% [<i>P</i> = .02], and 97% vs 81% [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the diagnosis of liver metastases than did <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (73% vs 15% [<i>P</i> < .001], 68% vs 41% [<i>P</i> = .04], and 83% vs 46% [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). According to patient-level analysis, the sensitivity of <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT for diagnosing liver metastases was higher than that of <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (88% vs 25%; <i>P</i> = .04). Conclusion In patients with recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas, <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT showed better performance than <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT in detecting bone metastases, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT performed better in detecting liver metastases. <b>Keywords:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC, <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA, Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240059
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT for Detection of Recurrent or Metastatic Paragangliomas

Panli Li, Shaoli Song, Liyan Bai, Linjie Bian et al.
3 citations
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
1.72
article

Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT for Detection of Recurrent or Metastatic Paragangliomas

Panli Li, Shaoli Song, Liyan Bai, Linjie Bian, Junyan Xu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of gallium 68 (<sup>68</sup>Ga)-DOTA-NaI3-octreotide (<sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC) and fluorine 18 (<sup>18</sup>F)-fluoro-l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (<sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA) PET/CT in detecting recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas. Materials and Methods This single-center retrospective study included patients with paragangliomas who underwent both <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT between August 2021 and December 2023. The diagnostic performance of these two tracers in detecting recurrent or metastatic tumors was compared using several metrics, including sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Results This study included 36 patients (median age, 52 years [range, 14-78 years]; 16 female, 20 male). Of these, nine underwent initial <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT examinations before treatment, and the remaining 27 underwent posttreatment examinations. Twenty-two of those 27 patients had recurrence or metastasis. According to lesion-level analysis, <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis of bone metastases than did <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT (97% vs 78% [<i>P</i> < .001], 85% vs 42% [<i>P</i> = .02], and 97% vs 81% [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the diagnosis of liver metastases than did <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (73% vs 15% [<i>P</i> < .001], 68% vs 41% [<i>P</i> = .04], and 83% vs 46% [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). According to patient-level analysis, the sensitivity of <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT for diagnosing liver metastases was higher than that of <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (88% vs 25%; <i>P</i> = .04). Conclusion In patients with recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas, <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT showed better performance than <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT in detecting bone metastases, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT performed better in detecting liver metastases. <b>Keywords:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC, <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA, Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Radiology Imaging CancerVol. 7(1)
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN)
Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.