Stress and resilience: associations of stress biomarkers with different conceptualizations of resilience

We provide readers with an overview of the literature on stress and resilience and their relationship to biomarkers of stress systems. We emphasize the need for precise definitions and operationalizations and the importance of considering the complexity of the stress and resilience constructs. Research on stress and resilience in conjunction with stress biomarkers is scarce, and longitudinal designs are lacking. However, some associations of stress biomarkers with resilience were found. These point toward a protective effect of resilience against the biological stress consequences. In this context, a clearer picture emerges for inflammation compared to cortisol. Finally, we point toward the need of longitudinal research, making use of sophisticated statistics and integration of individual perceptions into research designs. Future research is needed to map the complexity of stress and resilience, individually and in conjunction. • Resilience is currently conceptualized in different ways, with a dynamic approach emerging as the most appropriate solution. • Resilience is associated with stress biomarkers, in particular markers of inflammation. • Future research should focus on longitudinal studies, assessing life-events, biomarkers, and health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101463
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress and resilience: associations of stress biomarkers with different conceptualizations of resilience

Nicolas Rohleder, Veronika Ringgold
3 citations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Resilience and Mental Health
1.92
article

Stress and resilience: associations of stress biomarkers with different conceptualizations of resilience

Nicolas Rohleder, Veronika Ringgold
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We provide readers with an overview of the literature on stress and resilience and their relationship to biomarkers of stress systems. We emphasize the need for precise definitions and operationalizations and the importance of considering the complexity of the stress and resilience constructs. Research on stress and resilience in conjunction with stress biomarkers is scarce, and longitudinal designs are lacking. However, some associations of stress biomarkers with resilience were found. These point toward a protective effect of resilience against the biological stress consequences. In this context, a clearer picture emerges for inflammation compared to cortisol. Finally, we point toward the need of longitudinal research, making use of sophisticated statistics and integration of individual perceptions into research designs. Future research is needed to map the complexity of stress and resilience, individually and in conjunction. • Resilience is currently conceptualized in different ways, with a dynamic approach emerging as the most appropriate solution. • Resilience is associated with stress biomarkers, in particular markers of inflammation. • Future research should focus on longitudinal studies, assessing life-events, biomarkers, and health outcomes.

Current Opinion in Behavioral SciencesVol. 61
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Resilience and Mental Health
1.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.