Invariance transformations in wave-optics lensing: Implications for gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology

Gravitational lensing offers unique opportunities to learn about the astrophysical origin of distant sources, the abundance of intervening objects acting as lenses, and gravity and cosmology in general. However, all this information can only be retrieved as long as one can disentangle each effect from the finite number of observables. In the geometric optics regime, typical of electromagnetic radiation, when the wavelength of the lensed signal is small compared to the size of the lens, there are invariance transformations that change the mass of the lens and the source-lens configuration but leave the observables unchanged. Neglecting this “mass-sheet degeneracy” can lead to biased lens parameters or unrealistic low uncertainties, which could then transfer to an incorrect cosmography study. This might be different for gravitational waves as their long wavelengths can be comparable to the lens size and lensing enters into the wave-optics limit. We explore the existence of invariance transformations in the wave-optics regime of gravitational-wave lensing, extending previous work and examining the implications for astrophysical and cosmological studies. We study these invariance transformations using three different methods of increasing level of complexity: template mismatch, Fisher Matrix, and Bayesian parameter estimation. We find that, for a sufficiently loud signal, the degeneracy is partially broken and the lens and cosmological parameters, e.g. <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi>H</a:mi><a:mn>0</a:mn></a:msub></a:math>, can be retrieved independently and unbiased. In current ground-based detectors, though, considering also population studies, a strong constraint on these parameters seems quite remote and the prevailing degeneracy implies a larger uncertainty in the lens model reconstruction. However, with better sensitivity of the third-generation ground-based detectors, a meaningful constraint on <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mi>H</c:mi><c:mn>0</c:mn></c:msub></c:math> is possible to obtain. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.123015
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invariance transformations in wave-optics lensing: Implications for gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology

Anson Chen, José María Ezquiaga, P. Cremonese, D. Keitel
11 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
3.65
article

Invariance transformations in wave-optics lensing: Implications for gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology

Anson Chen, José María Ezquiaga, P. Cremonese, D. Keitel
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Gravitational lensing offers unique opportunities to learn about the astrophysical origin of distant sources, the abundance of intervening objects acting as lenses, and gravity and cosmology in general. However, all this information can only be retrieved as long as one can disentangle each effect from the finite number of observables. In the geometric optics regime, typical of electromagnetic radiation, when the wavelength of the lensed signal is small compared to the size of the lens, there are invariance transformations that change the mass of the lens and the source-lens configuration but leave the observables unchanged. Neglecting this “mass-sheet degeneracy” can lead to biased lens parameters or unrealistic low uncertainties, which could then transfer to an incorrect cosmography study. This might be different for gravitational waves as their long wavelengths can be comparable to the lens size and lensing enters into the wave-optics limit. We explore the existence of invariance transformations in the wave-optics regime of gravitational-wave lensing, extending previous work and examining the implications for astrophysical and cosmological studies. We study these invariance transformations using three different methods of increasing level of complexity: template mismatch, Fisher Matrix, and Bayesian parameter estimation. We find that, for a sufficiently loud signal, the degeneracy is partially broken and the lens and cosmological parameters, e.g. <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi>H</a:mi><a:mn>0</a:mn></a:msub></a:math>, can be retrieved independently and unbiased. In current ground-based detectors, though, considering also population studies, a strong constraint on these parameters seems quite remote and the prevailing degeneracy implies a larger uncertainty in the lens model reconstruction. However, with better sensitivity of the third-generation ground-based detectors, a meaningful constraint on <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mi>H</c:mi><c:mn>0</c:mn></c:msub></c:math> is possible to obtain. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(12)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Niels Brock (DK), Fundació Universitat-Empresa de les Illes Balears (ES), Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES), IAC (United States) (US)
Villum Fonden, Universidad de Málaga, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, European Commission, China Scholarship Council, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Direcció General de Recerca, Generalitat de Catalunya, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.