Genomic reconstruction reveals impact of population management strategies on modern Galápagos dogs

Free-breeding dogs have occupied the Galápagos Islands at least since the 1830s; however, it was not until the 1900s that dog populations grew substantially, endangering wildlife and spreading disease.<sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>3</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>4</sup> In 1981, efforts to control the population size of free-roaming dogs began.<sup>1</sup> Yet, there exist large free-roaming dog populations on the islands of Isabela and Santa Cruz whose ancestry has never been assessed on a genome-wide scale. We thus performed a complete genomic analysis of the current Galápagos dog population, as well as historical Galápagos dogs sampled between 1969 and 2003, testing for population structure, admixture, and shared ancestry. Our dataset included samples from 187 modern and six historical Galápagos dogs, together with whole-genome sequences from over 2,000 modern purebred and village dogs. Our results indicate that modern Galápagos dogs are recently admixed with purebred dogs but show no evidence of a population bottleneck related to the culling. Additionally, identity-by-descent analyses reveal evidence of shared shepherd-dog ancestry in the historical dogs. Overall, our results demonstrate that the 1980s culling of dogs was ineffective in controlling population size and did little to reduce genetic diversity, instead producing a stable and expanding population with genomic signatures of modern purebred dogs. The insights from this study can be used to improve population control strategies for the Galápagos Islands and other endangered endemic communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Biology
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.079
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic reconstruction reveals impact of population management strategies on modern Galápagos dogs

Tatiana R. Feuerborn, Jessica Hale, Reuben M. Buckley, Bruce D. Barnett et al.
Current Biology
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Genomic reconstruction reveals impact of population management strategies on modern Galápagos dogs

Tatiana R. Feuerborn, Jessica Hale, Reuben M. Buckley, Bruce D. Barnett, Gabriella J. Spatola, Emily V. Dutrow, Alex C. Harris, Elaine A. Ostrander, C. Miguel Pinto, Jennifer A. Betz, Timothy Alexander Mousseau, Gary K. Ostrander, Alberto Vélez
article en

Abstract

Free-breeding dogs have occupied the Galápagos Islands at least since the 1830s; however, it was not until the 1900s that dog populations grew substantially, endangering wildlife and spreading disease.<sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>3</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>4</sup> In 1981, efforts to control the population size of free-roaming dogs began.<sup>1</sup> Yet, there exist large free-roaming dog populations on the islands of Isabela and Santa Cruz whose ancestry has never been assessed on a genome-wide scale. We thus performed a complete genomic analysis of the current Galápagos dog population, as well as historical Galápagos dogs sampled between 1969 and 2003, testing for population structure, admixture, and shared ancestry. Our dataset included samples from 187 modern and six historical Galápagos dogs, together with whole-genome sequences from over 2,000 modern purebred and village dogs. Our results indicate that modern Galápagos dogs are recently admixed with purebred dogs but show no evidence of a population bottleneck related to the culling. Additionally, identity-by-descent analyses reveal evidence of shared shepherd-dog ancestry in the historical dogs. Overall, our results demonstrate that the 1980s culling of dogs was ineffective in controlling population size and did little to reduce genetic diversity, instead producing a stable and expanding population with genomic signatures of modern purebred dogs. The insights from this study can be used to improve population control strategies for the Galápagos Islands and other endangered endemic communities.

Current BiologyVol. 35(1)
Florida State University (US), Charles Darwin Foundation (EC), National Institutes of Health (US), Barnet Hospital (GB), National Human Genome Research Institute (US), Veterinarians Without Borders (US), Galapagos (Belgium) (BE)
Fundación Charles Darwin, National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.