Dynamics of striatal action selection and reinforcement learning

Spiny projection neurons (SPNs) in dorsal striatum are often proposed as a locus of reinforcement learning in the basal ganglia. Here, we identify and resolve a fundamental inconsistency between striatal reinforcement learning models and known SPN synaptic plasticity rules. Direct-pathway (dSPN) and indirect-pathway (iSPN) neurons, which promote and suppress actions, respectively, exhibit synaptic plasticity that reinforces activity associated with elevated or suppressed dopamine release. We show that iSPN plasticity prevents successful learning, as it reinforces activity patterns associated with negative outcomes. However, this pathological behavior is reversed if functionally opponent dSPNs and iSPNs, which promote and suppress the current behavior, are simultaneously activated by efferent input following action selection. This prediction is supported by striatal recordings and contrasts with prior models of SPN representations. In our model, learning and action selection signals can be multiplexed without interference, enabling learning algorithms beyond those of standard temporal difference models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eLife
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.101747
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of striatal action selection and reinforcement learning

Sandeep Robert Datta, Jack Lindsey, Ashok Litwin-Kumar, Jeffrey E. Markowitz et al.
5 citations
eLife
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
1.34
article

Dynamics of striatal action selection and reinforcement learning

Sandeep Robert Datta, Jack Lindsey, Ashok Litwin-Kumar, Jeffrey E. Markowitz, Winthrop F. Gillis
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Spiny projection neurons (SPNs) in dorsal striatum are often proposed as a locus of reinforcement learning in the basal ganglia. Here, we identify and resolve a fundamental inconsistency between striatal reinforcement learning models and known SPN synaptic plasticity rules. Direct-pathway (dSPN) and indirect-pathway (iSPN) neurons, which promote and suppress actions, respectively, exhibit synaptic plasticity that reinforces activity associated with elevated or suppressed dopamine release. We show that iSPN plasticity prevents successful learning, as it reinforces activity patterns associated with negative outcomes. However, this pathological behavior is reversed if functionally opponent dSPNs and iSPNs, which promote and suppress the current behavior, are simultaneously activated by efferent input following action selection. This prediction is supported by striatal recordings and contrasts with prior models of SPN representations. In our model, learning and action selection signals can be multiplexed without interference, enabling learning algorithms beyond those of standard temporal difference models.

eLifeVol. 13
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Harvard University (US), The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering (US), Brain (Germany) (DE), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
1.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamics of striatal action selection and reinforcement learning — Sandeep Robert Datta, Jack Lindsey, et al. · eLife (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS