Dissecting Stochasticity in Translation: Time in Start Codon Selection as a Case-Study

With few exceptions, biological research dealing with stochasticity in molecular and cellular biology has focused on transcriptional processes (e.g., Elowitz et al. 2002; Lipniacki et al. 2006). Consequently, philosophical analyses have also centered on its role in transcription (e.g., Casali and Merlin 2020). Nonetheless, recent empirical evidence clearly shows that stochasticity is also pervasive in translation (e.g., Boersma et al. 2019). Focusing on time and a non-canonical case of translation (i.e., standard vs. alternative start codon selection), this paper aims to disentangle a way in which stochasticity can intervene in models of this intracellular process. Having provided a definition of what we mean by stochasticity, first, we introduce two models of time in order to show where and how stochasticity can make a difference in the timing of translation processes. Second, we show how this difference can be biologically relevant for cell physiology. We conclude that, from an explanatory point of view, it is thus worth dissecting stochasticity when studying translation, gene expression and, more generally, biological processes at the molecular level.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Theory and Practice in Biology
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3998/ptpbio.5321
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissecting Stochasticity in Translation: Time in Start Codon Selection as a Case-Study

Philosophy Theory and Practice in Biology
Intellectual Property Law
article

Dissecting Stochasticity in Translation: Time in Start Codon Selection as a Case-Study

article en

Abstract

With few exceptions, biological research dealing with stochasticity in molecular and cellular biology has focused on transcriptional processes (e.g., Elowitz et al. 2002; Lipniacki et al. 2006). Consequently, philosophical analyses have also centered on its role in transcription (e.g., Casali and Merlin 2020). Nonetheless, recent empirical evidence clearly shows that stochasticity is also pervasive in translation (e.g., Boersma et al. 2019). Focusing on time and a non-canonical case of translation (i.e., standard vs. alternative start codon selection), this paper aims to disentangle a way in which stochasticity can intervene in models of this intracellular process. Having provided a definition of what we mean by stochasticity, first, we introduce two models of time in order to show where and how stochasticity can make a difference in the timing of translation processes. Second, we show how this difference can be biologically relevant for cell physiology. We conclude that, from an explanatory point of view, it is thus worth dissecting stochasticity when studying translation, gene expression and, more generally, biological processes at the molecular level.

Philosophy Theory and Practice in BiologyVol. 17(2)
University of Insubria (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dissecting Stochasticity in Translation: Time in Start Codon Selection as a Case-Study · Philosophy Theory and Practice in Biology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS