Are competent citizens critical democrats? Political resources and evaluations of democratic institutions

This article examines how cognitive resources such as internal efficacy and political knowledge relate to citizens’ ability to evaluate democratic institutions. Using original survey data from the United States (<em>N</em> = 1093), we find, first, that internal efficacy is associated with more positive assessments of democratic institutions in general. Conversely, political knowledge is associated with more discriminating assessments of specific institutions. Third, political knowledge moderates the positive impact of internal efficacy. Finally, while partisan and ideological reasoning are present in citizens’ evaluations of democracy, greater political knowledge is associated with more nuanced assessments of democratic institutions across parties and ideological orientations. These results suggest that increasing cognitive resources can contribute to the development of critical citizens capable of identifying undemocratic features of their political systems.<br>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Social Science Journal
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2024.2432190
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are competent citizens critical democrats? Political resources and evaluations of democratic institutions

Michael A. Hansen, Agustín Goenaga
2 citations
The Social Science Journal
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
4.46
article

Are competent citizens critical democrats? Political resources and evaluations of democratic institutions

Michael A. Hansen, Agustín Goenaga
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article examines how cognitive resources such as internal efficacy and political knowledge relate to citizens’ ability to evaluate democratic institutions. Using original survey data from the United States (<em>N</em> = 1093), we find, first, that internal efficacy is associated with more positive assessments of democratic institutions in general. Conversely, political knowledge is associated with more discriminating assessments of specific institutions. Third, political knowledge moderates the positive impact of internal efficacy. Finally, while partisan and ideological reasoning are present in citizens’ evaluations of democracy, greater political knowledge is associated with more nuanced assessments of democratic institutions across parties and ideological orientations. These results suggest that increasing cognitive resources can contribute to the development of critical citizens capable of identifying undemocratic features of their political systems.<br>

The Social Science JournalVol. 62(4)
University of Turku (FI), Lund University (SE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.