Defining and Measuring Deception in Sequential Decision Systems: Application to Network Defense

Concealing true targets plays a crucial role in preventing adversaries from launching effective attacks. Deception techniques enhance security by misleading and delaying adversaries. This paper presents a framework for defining and measuring deception in sequential decision systems modeled as Markov decision processes with task constraints. We introduce three types of deception: diversionary, targeted, and equivocal, which are implemented by synthesizing deceptive policies using constrained optimization. Adversaries are modeled with inverse reinforcement learning to infer system goals. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of our deception techniques in misleading adversaries and enhancing system security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/milcom61039.2024.10773660
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining and Measuring Deception in Sequential Decision Systems: Application to Network Defense

Alexander Benvenuti, Yerin Kim, Matthew Hale, Nathaniel D. Bastian et al.
1 citations
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
0.35
article

Defining and Measuring Deception in Sequential Decision Systems: Application to Network Defense

Alexander Benvenuti, Yerin Kim, Matthew Hale, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Abhishek N. Kulkarni, Mustafa Karabag, Ufuk Topcu, Bo Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Concealing true targets plays a crucial role in preventing adversaries from launching effective attacks. Deception techniques enhance security by misleading and delaying adversaries. This paper presents a framework for defining and measuring deception in sequential decision systems modeled as Markov decision processes with task constraints. We introduce three types of deception: diversionary, targeted, and equivocal, which are implemented by synthesizing deceptive policies using constrained optimization. Adversaries are modeled with inverse reinforcement learning to infer system goals. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of our deception techniques in misleading adversaries and enhancing system security.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US), United States Military Academy (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation, Arm, Advanced Research Projects Agency
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.