A Bayesian Multi-input CNN for Induction Motors Fault Diagnosis

Fault diagnosis is critical for ensuring the high performance and reliability of induction motors. However, existing deep learning-based fault diagnosis methods require substantial amounts of training data which is impractical in real industrial scenarios. Additionally, as with classification problems, traditional deep learning-based fault diagnosis methods typically provide point-estimate predictions without offering confidence levels, leading to situations of overconfidence and underconfidence. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel induction motor fault diagnosis method that combines a multi-input convolutional neural net (MICNN) with a feature extraction model, further enhanced by Bayesian deep learning. The MICNN extracts features from two different signal domains, providing a more comprehensive understanding of vibration signals. Bayesian deep learning treats model parameters as random variables, enabling the estimation of a probability distribution over the model predictions. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, achieving $15 \%$ higher diagnostic accuracy compared to traditional fault diagnosis methods under the conditions of limited data. Additionally, in noisy environments, the proposed method reflects the confidence of diagnostic results, enhancing model trustworthiness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/srse63568.2024.10772422
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Bayesian Multi-input CNN for Induction Motors Fault Diagnosis

Weiwen Peng, Guodong Feng, Zhaoyang Lai
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
article

A Bayesian Multi-input CNN for Induction Motors Fault Diagnosis

Weiwen Peng, Guodong Feng, Zhaoyang Lai
article en

Abstract

Fault diagnosis is critical for ensuring the high performance and reliability of induction motors. However, existing deep learning-based fault diagnosis methods require substantial amounts of training data which is impractical in real industrial scenarios. Additionally, as with classification problems, traditional deep learning-based fault diagnosis methods typically provide point-estimate predictions without offering confidence levels, leading to situations of overconfidence and underconfidence. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel induction motor fault diagnosis method that combines a multi-input convolutional neural net (MICNN) with a feature extraction model, further enhanced by Bayesian deep learning. The MICNN extracts features from two different signal domains, providing a more comprehensive understanding of vibration signals. Bayesian deep learning treats model parameters as random variables, enabling the estimation of a probability distribution over the model predictions. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, achieving $15 \%$ higher diagnostic accuracy compared to traditional fault diagnosis methods under the conditions of limited data. Additionally, in noisy environments, the proposed method reflects the confidence of diagnostic results, enhancing model trustworthiness.

Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Bayesian Multi-input CNN for Induction Motors Fault Diagnosis — Weiwen Peng, Guodong Feng, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS