Knowledge, attitudes, and self-perceived skills regarding ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis and schizophrenia in primary care physicians: new insights from Tunisia

Abstract Background There is evidence indicating that an important proportion of young people at ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis do consult in primary care, but their identification may be hindered by multiple factors, such as primary care physicians (PCPs)’ limited skills and perceived stigma toward the condition. This study aimed to investigate attitudes/beliefs toward both UHR and schizophrenia and perceived self-efficacy in screening for, diagnosing, and managing these conditions among PCPs. The secondary objective was to determine the potential effects of psychosis level (UHR vs. schizophrenia) on PCP’s views. Methods A cross-sectional survey was carried out among Tunisian PCPs working in primary care setting in Tunisia ( N = 232, 66.4% females, mean age of 47.5 ± 9.9 years). An anonymous paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire was adopted to collect data. PCPs were asked to read vignettes describing individuals with UHR and schizophrenia and answer a series of questions that followed. Results The schizophrenia vignette aroused significantly more feelings of “need to help the person” than the UHR vignette (87.8% vs. 88%, p = .022). The perceptions that the person depicted in the vignette is “strange” and “not intelligent” were more frequently endorsed for UHR than schizophrenia (18.7% vs. 16%, p = 0.028, and 8.4% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.043, respectively), whereas the person with schizophrenia was perceived are more dangerous than the UHR person (38.4% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.033). Only 28.9% and 14% of participants agreed that they have the necessary skills to make the diagnosis and manage the condition depicted in the UHR vignette, respectively. Conclusion Findings indicated that a high proportion of our Tunisian PCPs show a deficit in identifying both UHR and schizophrenia diagnoses. Given that PCPs can be key sources of referral of at-risk young help-seekers to specialized early intervention services, urgent interventions are needed to help PCPs enhance their knowledge and reduce stigma associated with psychosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle East Current Psychiatry
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-024-00488-5
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, attitudes, and self-perceived skills regarding ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis and schizophrenia in primary care physicians: new insights from Tunisia

Majda Cheour, Feten Fekih‐Romdhane, W. Homri, Alexandre Andrade Loch et al.
Middle East Current Psychiatry
Mental Health and Psychiatry
article

Knowledge, attitudes, and self-perceived skills regarding ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis and schizophrenia in primary care physicians: new insights from Tunisia

Majda Cheour, Feten Fekih‐Romdhane, W. Homri, Alexandre Andrade Loch, Abir Hakiri, Souheil R. Hallit, Amira Jaoua
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background There is evidence indicating that an important proportion of young people at ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis do consult in primary care, but their identification may be hindered by multiple factors, such as primary care physicians (PCPs)’ limited skills and perceived stigma toward the condition. This study aimed to investigate attitudes/beliefs toward both UHR and schizophrenia and perceived self-efficacy in screening for, diagnosing, and managing these conditions among PCPs. The secondary objective was to determine the potential effects of psychosis level (UHR vs. schizophrenia) on PCP’s views. Methods A cross-sectional survey was carried out among Tunisian PCPs working in primary care setting in Tunisia ( N = 232, 66.4% females, mean age of 47.5 ± 9.9 years). An anonymous paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire was adopted to collect data. PCPs were asked to read vignettes describing individuals with UHR and schizophrenia and answer a series of questions that followed. Results The schizophrenia vignette aroused significantly more feelings of “need to help the person” than the UHR vignette (87.8% vs. 88%, p = .022). The perceptions that the person depicted in the vignette is “strange” and “not intelligent” were more frequently endorsed for UHR than schizophrenia (18.7% vs. 16%, p = 0.028, and 8.4% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.043, respectively), whereas the person with schizophrenia was perceived are more dangerous than the UHR person (38.4% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.033). Only 28.9% and 14% of participants agreed that they have the necessary skills to make the diagnosis and manage the condition depicted in the UHR vignette, respectively. Conclusion Findings indicated that a high proportion of our Tunisian PCPs show a deficit in identifying both UHR and schizophrenia diagnoses. Given that PCPs can be key sources of referral of at-risk young help-seekers to specialized early intervention services, urgent interventions are needed to help PCPs enhance their knowledge and reduce stigma associated with psychosis.

Middle East Current PsychiatryVol. 31(1)
Applied Science Private University (JO), Holy Spirit University of Kaslik (LB), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Hôpital Razi de La Manouba (TN), Tunis El Manar University (TN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Mental Health and Psychiatry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.