Opportunities and pitfalls of regression algorithms for predicting the residual value of heavy equipment — A comparative analysis

The residual value of heavy equipment is essential for financial and economic considerations in the construction industry. In practice, empirical methods are frequently used to determine the residual value of a given piece of equipment. Here, various regression methods are compared based on a real-world dataset of used heavy equipment sales from a construction company. The results show that the prediction performance of traditional methods is clearly worse when compared to machine learning models not yet employed for this purpose. For the latter, preprocessing and parameter tuning are essential, and the article guides through these steps. Further, the article demonstrates how a variable importance value comparable across all methods can be obtained. These findings may also be useful in other applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109599
Primary Topic
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities and pitfalls of regression algorithms for predicting the residual value of heavy equipment — A comparative analysis

Leopold Winkler, Peter Filzmoser, Marco Huymajer, Alexandra Mazak‐Huemer et al.
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
article

Opportunities and pitfalls of regression algorithms for predicting the residual value of heavy equipment — A comparative analysis

Leopold Winkler, Peter Filzmoser, Marco Huymajer, Alexandra Mazak‐Huemer, Hans Kraxner
article en

Abstract

The residual value of heavy equipment is essential for financial and economic considerations in the construction industry. In practice, empirical methods are frequently used to determine the residual value of a given piece of equipment. Here, various regression methods are compared based on a real-world dataset of used heavy equipment sales from a construction company. The results show that the prediction performance of traditional methods is clearly worse when compared to machine learning models not yet employed for this purpose. For the latter, preprocessing and parameter tuning are essential, and the article guides through these steps. Further, the article demonstrates how a variable importance value comparable across all methods can be obtained. These findings may also be useful in other applications.

Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 141
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), TU Wien (AT), Montanuniversität Leoben (AT), Donauspital (AT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.