The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Firm Value: Evidence from Korea

ABSTRACT This study examines the impact of a mandatory audit firm rotation policy on client firm value from the investors’ perspective. This study is conducted in Korea, where this policy was implemented from 2006 to 2010. Firm value is measured as Tobin’s q in the stock market for the years 2000 to 2013. The study analyzes firm valuation in relation to continuing engagement, voluntary audit firm rotation, and mandatory audit firm rotation during the pre-regulation (2000–2005), regulation (2006–2010), and post-regulation (2011–2013) periods. The findings reveal that investors reacted negatively to client firms being subjected to mandatory audit firm rotation and responded positively once mandatory audit firm rotation was removed. Overall, the results suggest that investors in the financial market are not supportive of mandatory audit firm rotation. Data Availability: All data are available from the public database identified in the paper. JEL Classifications: M42.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Accounting Research
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2022-038
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Firm Value: Evidence from Korea

Youngdeok Lim
3 citations
Journal of International Accounting Research
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
2.84
article

The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Firm Value: Evidence from Korea

Youngdeok Lim
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the impact of a mandatory audit firm rotation policy on client firm value from the investors’ perspective. This study is conducted in Korea, where this policy was implemented from 2006 to 2010. Firm value is measured as Tobin’s q in the stock market for the years 2000 to 2013. The study analyzes firm valuation in relation to continuing engagement, voluntary audit firm rotation, and mandatory audit firm rotation during the pre-regulation (2000–2005), regulation (2006–2010), and post-regulation (2011–2013) periods. The findings reveal that investors reacted negatively to client firms being subjected to mandatory audit firm rotation and responded positively once mandatory audit firm rotation was removed. Overall, the results suggest that investors in the financial market are not supportive of mandatory audit firm rotation. Data Availability: All data are available from the public database identified in the paper. JEL Classifications: M42.

Journal of International Accounting ResearchVol. 24(2)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
2.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.