Avenues towards reconciling wild and managed bee proponents

Bees are crucial for food security and biodiversity. However, managed bees are increasingly considered drivers of wild bee declines, leading to stakeholder conflicts and restrictive policies. We propose avenues to reconcile wild and managed bee proponents and point out knowledge gaps that hinder the development of evidence-based policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2024.11.009
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Avenues towards reconciling wild and managed bee proponents

Neal Williams, Katja Hogendoorn, Lars Straub, Jean‐Daniel Charrière et al.
10 citations
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Plant and animal studies
10.29
article

Avenues towards reconciling wild and managed bee proponents

Neal Williams, Katja Hogendoorn, Lars Straub, Jean‐Daniel Charrière, David Kleijn, Gard W. Otis, Markus Neuditschko, Vincent Dietemann, Nigel E. Raıne, Christian W. W. Pirk, Lorenzo Marini, Alexis Beaurepaire, Simon Geoffrey Potts, Axel Brockmann, S Tosi, Yves Le Conte, Joshua W. Campbell, Alexandra‐Maria Klein, Robert J. Paxton, Matthias Albrecht, Peter Neumann, Fabio Sgolastra, Natalie Boyle, Samuel Boff, Josef Settele, Geoffrey R. Williams, Theresa L Singer
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Bees are crucial for food security and biodiversity. However, managed bees are increasingly considered drivers of wild bee declines, leading to stakeholder conflicts and restrictive policies. We propose avenues to reconcile wild and managed bee proponents and point out knowledge gaps that hinder the development of evidence-based policies.

Trends in Ecology & EvolutionVol. 40(1)
University of Bern (CH), Utah State University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Padua (IT), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Lund University (SE), National Centre for Biological Sciences (IN), Universität Ulm (DE), Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory (US), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Agroscope (CH), Federal Office for Agriculture (CH), Technische Hochschule Ulm (DE), University of Turin (IT), The University of Adelaide (AU), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of Reading (GB), University of Guelph (CA), Auburn University (US), University of California, Davis (US), Wageningen University & Research (NL), University of Bologna (IT), University of Lausanne (CH)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, European Commission, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant and animal studies
10.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.